DarkElf (3051) - La Jolla, California, USA - JUL 20, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(12 oz bottle) Mild maltiness and mild hoppy bitterness make this a little better than a cheap macro, but this is still just a mediocre beer, not worthy of having all 12 ounces consumed during this rating; Mildly sweet with a light corn flavor; The nose smells a little stinky - blech! Fairly thin body, light on the palate; Pale yellow color and crystal clearwith very little head when poured, and no lacing; Pretty worthless beer; Good, my rating is complete, now I can pour the rest of this down the drain
3fourths (9104) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - JUL 15, 2004
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: APR 29, 2009 Light yellow, slightly grainy aroma, very weak nose. Light lemon, grass and crisp citrus in finish. A little too thin and light.
Saarlander (1686) - Saarlouis, GERMANY - JUN 24, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: AUG 28, 2005 I really liked this lager, it is very refreshing, with a good flavor, It quenches a thirst good, knocked a couple back on my balcony on a hot summer day, bbq’n! A nice change in lagers I’ve had!
Enniskillen (2045) - Salinas, California, USA - MAR 4, 2004
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
For a lager it isn't all that bad, malty, super thin. Much better option then any of the Macrobrews as far a a thin, lighter beer goes. $1.09 for the single, it was worth it.
JohnC (3004) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - FEB 13, 2004
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
malty nose, clear yellow body, very drinkable. A pretty decent lager. certainly would be good on a summer's day
AleDrinker (1089) - Sunnyvale, California, USA - JAN 27, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Firestone's take on budweiser. Nothing special about this lager. Would be nice on a hot summer day, but so would seltzer.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - NOV 6, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
The archetypical lager gold color on the pour with a modest sized head that is frothy in texture also bright white in color, with the residual lace a fine sheet to cover the glass. The quintessential malt nose, crisp and clean, start is lightly sweet, top is light to moderate in feel. Finish is mildly acidic with the hops sparse in their spiciness, very dry, as with most of their beers, a bit too thin-waisted for me to give them much of a score.
auto (163) - California, USA - OCT 18, 2003
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
minty type smell, the taste is a taste i have never had before. the colour is light and breezy like a cool kiddy pool with a urine concentration of 80%. that's just the colour, the taste is much better.
elnadeau (786) - Laguna Niguel, California, USA - SEP 16, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Medium gold with a small white head, prominent malty/yeasty nose. Malt character is sweet and slightly fruity, has more substance and good hops presence for a lager. Overall a pleasant, drinkable lager.
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - APR 28, 2003
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
A fairly mild lager, with some crispness and faint bitterness. Floral aroma and flavor. Innocuous. Their Double Barrel Ale is considerably better.