KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - JUL 22, 2002
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This is one of the worst imports in existence. Blandness rules from its fizzy carbonated head to its wimpy all-around taste. The only thing going for it is its promising aroma, which turns out to be pure fraud upon first taste. Don’t waste your money on this.
MartinT (8396) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUL 21, 2002
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Rendered unconscious by the powerful and quite precise jet-propelled urine of a skunk…In retrospect, I think I saw some malt back there, but I honestly don’t want to think about it…
Mads Langtved (2244) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - JUN 23, 2002
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This beer is a very, very bad beer. I agree with Jacob that the beer tastes like piss. However allow me to specify: Me and Jacob once had a teacher caled FISCHER and we could esaly imagine how she (and the french boys) would have pissed in this cheap waterish ’beer’.
Hildigöltur (5103) - København, DENMARK - JUN 23, 2002
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
The colour is extremely light, but the head is acceptable. There is almost no aroma. All you can sense is a weak smell of urine. The taste is very weak and pissy as well (I and my friends Mads and Martin discussed the possibility that the penis of the small French boy on the bottle would fit in the bottle opening). Luckily there is no aftertaste at all. If it wasn’t for the bottle this beer would not be drunken by anyone. France + Beer = PISS!!!
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - JUN 16, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Fizzy, disappointing. Not really worth typing about. I used to like this beer....once.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUN 15, 2002
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
this was surprisingly nice. it was very bubbly, light, and had a very clean/dry finish. could easily drink a few of these by the swimming pool. i wonder if it’s easily skunked by the green bottle...
BillKismet (3418) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUN 3, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Flat pilsneresque smell and taste. Just a forgettable offering--half of which I used to cook my brats.
Aubrey (3482) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - MAY 1, 2002
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clean smell; sharp and crisp mouthfeel - up front. Bland flavor. Very carbonated with a hint of tartness... and maybe even a pinch of apple. Aftertaste was very unappealing: kind of oily with a bitter carbonation. Leaves the mouth with a watery sensation. There was a little sweetness detected, but nothing to write home about. Maybe ok with food, but it kinda sucks all by itself.
kmeves (1098) - Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA - APR 26, 2002
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A very light lager, slightly skunky. Blond hue, no head. Light lager aftertaste.
neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - APR 18, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
A fantastic 65cl bottle. A nice sweet smell, with pleanty of carbonation and a frothy head. Good golden colour. Sweet tasting, with a slightly dry palate. To coin a phrase - ’s’alright’.