morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 18, 2002
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
LoveCaissa (873) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - SEP 6, 2002
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Light golden colour. Weak hoppy aroma. Sourish and fruity flavour with no bitterness at all. A very bad ’beer’, not unlike a mix of apple cider and beer. Just bare drinkable, so why not buy a real beer???
ARMed (622) - Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 2, 2002
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
After glancing at the bottle one might get a slight uphoria for the next 10 minutes, but the anticipation quickly turns to distain. The aroma is acidic and tart. The taste soon follows suit. Probably goes well with French cuisines, though this was not the case with my meal. Extremely disappointed in both the scallops and the brew.
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - AUG 15, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This beer really sucks. One of the worst ever. Totally skunky, and it stinks too. My friend who is an alcoholic and will drink anything, who has chronic cirrhosis of the liver and hepatitis from drinking too much, even said this stuff sucks. Doesn’t get much worse than that.
PorterPounder (6144) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - AUG 13, 2002
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: MAY 30, 2004 Rerate
Notice a bit more maltiness this time around. Not half bad. Original 2.7 The French need to stick to wine. Quite bland with a skunky aroma. Good compliment to French food however and the lightness made it appropriate for lunch
mwesth (279) - Skovlunde, DENMARK - JUL 23, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: JUL 15, 2003 Re-rate 150703: When I have this beer in DK, it is chemical and phenolic. I have had it bottled and canned in France and that is a different and pleasant experience. Well hopped and malty. The ABV is 6%, not 4,5... Nothing special, but a good lager.
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - JUL 22, 2002
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This is one of the worst imports in existence. Blandness rules from its fizzy carbonated head to its wimpy all-around taste. The only thing going for it is its promising aroma, which turns out to be pure fraud upon first taste. Don’t waste your money on this.
MartinT (8492) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUL 21, 2002
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Rendered unconscious by the powerful and quite precise jet-propelled urine of a skunk…In retrospect, I think I saw some malt back there, but I honestly don’t want to think about it…
Mads Langtved (2244) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - JUN 23, 2002
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This beer is a very, very bad beer. I agree with Jacob that the beer tastes like piss. However allow me to specify: Me and Jacob once had a teacher caled FISCHER and we could esaly imagine how she (and the french boys) would have pissed in this cheap waterish ’beer’.
Hildigöltur (5104) - København, DENMARK - JUN 23, 2002
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
The colour is extremely light, but the head is acceptable. There is almost no aroma. All you can sense is a weak smell of urine. The taste is very weak and pissy as well (I and my friends Mads and Martin discussed the possibility that the penis of the small French boy on the bottle would fit in the bottle opening). Luckily there is no aftertaste at all. If it wasn’t for the bottle this beer would not be drunken by anyone. France + Beer = PISS!!!