Indra (2711) - Overland Park, Kansas, USA - JUN 28, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I am perhaps unobjectively pleased to learn that this is not just an ’American Amber’, it’s a California Common/Steam. Light on the aroma, but what is there is balanced and pleasant enough, being malty and hoppy. Brilliantly clear copper color, very slight effervescence and no real head to speak of. Caramel malt flavors are quite prevalent here, sweetness as well. Hops are there, starting about midway and following through to the finish, but this beer is decidedly sweet, less bitter. Some graininess in the finish, more malty caramel flavors as well. Mouthfeel is a tad thin. This isn’t a real Steam beer, IMHO, Amber Lager, definitely, but there is a difference. I like the tingly finish, but overall, a bit too sweet for me to rate it highly.
argo0 (12440) - Washington DC, USA - JUN 27, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
malty -- sweet with a bit of vanilla at the outset, slightly bitter in the aftertaste. all in all, a decidedly mediocre beer.
Aurelius (4743) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUN 25, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - JUN 21, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: FEB 27, 2004 ralph steadman's label depiction of sinister leaping mutant flea-dogs is unsavory, but the appearance of the beer itself is all i ask for in elegant design: a woodstained-orange that almost glows beneath a briefly sudsy crown. full nose of grain and fruit, call it: orange marmalade on a toasted bagel.hops emerge where they should for proper balance; medium body. i had a decent session. you?
TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - JUN 7, 2002
3.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Nice amber color. Well balanced flavor. No head retention. Nice middle-of-the-road amber. Very cool label.
kmeves (1098) - Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 31, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Floral aroma, sweet tasting, amber color. Too carbonated in my opinion.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - APR 28, 2002
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Deep amber, frothy beige head, nice lace. Nose is malt, slightly sweet, as is the front, middle is light, finish is lightly carbonated, dry, fair hop presence, drinkable.
aracauna (3290) - Georgia, USA - APR 19, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This tasted a lot like the the Dunkles I had at Gordon Biersch, but better. Basically typical dark lager flavors with just a little more character, probably coming from the steam-style brewing.
Choke (96) - Massachusetts, USA - APR 4, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
I was pretty impressed with this beer had a good taste and a nice aftertaste like every beer should have,,,i was suprised with this one i bought the variety pack,,,,so got to go taste em all
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAR 30, 2002
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: JAN 11, 2004 Pretty good lager. It reminded me of a less hoppy version of Brooklyn Lager. Ends very smooth and dry, with a slight bit of sweetness.