RateBeer
overall
10
72
style
Brewed by Fosters Brewing (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager
Southbank, Victoria, Australia

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 10   MEAN: 1.93/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.26   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
Share this beer with friends!
No commercial description


laur11's rating

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
laur11 (20) - - APR 25, 2013
Though not really "Australian for beer," Fosters is an easy-to-drink average brew.


1.7
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
emancomeith (8) - - FEB 20, 2011 does not count
Nothing special here.I was under the impression that this beer would put me on my ass. It didnt. As a matter of fact,several didnt.It was still a good beer that reminded me alot of Corona.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JUL 7, 2004
Extra? An additional .6%% How does this make it anything different from the blue labelled beer? There is a definite difference though, and not a favourable one. Very chemically and poor.

2.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
lasonovich (151) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 7, 2003
Much better than ordinary fosters, has a nice strong flavour and a good alcohol content. Difficult to get these days though.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Winchester (75) - Struggle Town NSW, AUSTRALIA - AUG 31, 2003
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2003 A typical Fosters. Tastes the same as the Lager, with apparently more alcohol. Atleast ill pass out quicker so i dont have to drink this crap anynmore.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 4/20
LoveABeer (141) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 31, 2003
Extra what? Its just Fosters Lager, with a pretty label on it. Sweet Chemical Corn taste, no aroma, bad aftertaste.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 3/20
Caton (160) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAR 3, 2002
I think they forgot to add the extra bit of flavour, but sure delivered on the chemicals.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 10, 2001
This absolutely sucked, i can’t belive it made it on this site, this tastes like chemical crap, like you motelpogo, i wouldn’t be sad to see it go.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
DJH-Bird99 (208) - Nijkerk, NETHERLANDS - NOV 5, 2001

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
motelpogo (6515) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 11, 2001
Extra just means a little more alcoholic. still the same lack of any flavour. haven’t seen it around much lately. wouldn’t be a great loss


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »





Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50