2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
1.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Nothing special here.I was under the impression that this beer would put me on my ass.
It didnt.
As a matter of fact,several didnt.It was still a good beer that reminded me alot of Corona.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Extra? An additional .6%% How does this make it anything different from the blue labelled beer? There is a definite difference though, and not a favourable one. Very chemically and poor.
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Much better than ordinary fosters, has a nice strong flavour and a good alcohol content. Difficult to get these days though.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2003 A typical Fosters. Tastes the same as the Lager, with apparently more alcohol. Atleast ill pass out quicker so i dont have to drink this crap anynmore.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Extra what? Its just Fosters Lager, with a pretty label on it. Sweet Chemical Corn taste, no aroma, bad aftertaste.
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
I think they forgot to add the extra bit of flavour, but sure delivered on the chemicals.
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This absolutely sucked, i can’t belive it made it on this site, this tastes like chemical crap, like you motelpogo, i wouldn’t be sad to see it go.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Extra just means a little more alcoholic. still the same lack of any flavour. haven’t seen it around much lately. wouldn’t be a great loss
|
