Mrdougie (1) - Glasgow, - OCT 4, 2013
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
dreadful awful dreck. This manages the feat of being even worse than the 4.0% Fosters we are subjected to here in the UK.
gegwilson (2242) - North Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 3, 2015
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Drank straight from the bottle at the Bansdale darts tournament - a night when I should have taken more beer. Cadged a bottle of this from Mark B to avoid having to drink Budweiser which was the only other beer on offer. This was better, but was still pretty bad.
weordie (412) - Tyne & Wear, ENGLAND - JUL 9, 2015
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Awful piss water that is so bad it has to be served nearly frozen to be able to drink it.
Sim81 (17) - - MAY 1, 2015
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
From 660ml bottle. A pleasant surprise! Caramel flavour which gives way to a refreshing, smooth lager. If you’re looking for a an easy drinking lager with more taste than your average lagers, this could be the one for you.
The_Osprey (3839) - Richmond, Greater London, ENGLAND - APR 23, 2015
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
After a long search, I’ve finally harpooned this whale. 300ml clear bottle, 4.8%, BB June 2015. Pale orange, clear, sparkling, small foamy white head, full lacing. Aroma is light, corny, some pencil shavings. Body is light, foamy, tingly carbonation. Taste is very light - so light that I can taste the booze. A little dusty. Dry and refreshing finish. Watery and plain, but no bad flavours at all. A fine pale lager, better than expected. Can see why people would like it.
LED40 (81) - SCOTLAND - NOV 14, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A decent standard lager. The aroma is faint hops and cooked vegetable with a dark yellow appearance. The taste is typical for the style - easy drinking and refreshing with a hint of caramel. The mouth feel is thicker than the standard Fosters but not as carbonated and the taste is also slightly improved. Overall nothing bad about this but certainly not exceptional.
eastkenttom (109) - herne bay, Kent, ENGLAND - SEP 20, 2014
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JAN 8, 2015 This doesn?t have the same distinctive taste of the regular Foster?s, but I prefer it. A decent after work grab out the fridge beer but it won?t win any prizes. Perhaps a little sweet.
allmyvinyl (7005) - Edinburgh, SCOTLAND - AUG 30, 2014
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
660ml bottle from Tesco. Pours clear gold, thick white head. Aromas of cooked vegetables and metal. Taste is sweet, mineral notes. Thin, pissy finish.
s_hartshorne (2411) - wakefield, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 28, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle wyke horse heckmondwike. Golden white head aroma is pale malts grain. Taste is same quite sweet light hops. Thin body ok carbonation. Not the worst lager I’ve had.
Carlg13 (4) - Bradford, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 6, 2014 does not count
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottles usually seem really flat with little bubbles, on the other hand it’s easy on the stomach and not too fizzy
ManVsBeer (6219) - Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND - JAN 29, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. A slight improvement on normal Fosters, but mainly a drab effort. Golden with a medium sweetness and easy to drink.