KnutAlbert (6110) - Oslo, - APR 13, 2009
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle in AMnchester.
Imagine removing even more flavrou from a watery and uninteresting beer. I tried this because it was free, amazing that people will pay money for stuff like this.
Xorue (9) - ENGLAND - MAR 4, 2013 does not count
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Compared to its mother lager, this is a much better drink. It is much crisper and cleaner. It has a nice pale golden look about, and has a much better taste. It goes down crisp and light. Over looked due to its terrible namesake.
Inbruges (5) - Essex, ENGLAND - DEC 17, 2012 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
If you were to guff through a slice of bread and into a glass of cold water then you could probably re-create this beer perfectly well. Fosters beer is the stalwart of bad house parties and is best enjoyed while listening to the music of Dappy. Slightly less enjoyable than the after effects of haemorrhoid surgery.
wimpyjoe (3974) - Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND - JUN 15, 2012
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Same old rubbish but much colder, which helps to take the poor flavour away.
Cunningham (4522) - Halden, NORWAY - NOV 1, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can from local grocery store in Liverpool - No detectable aroma and extreme light coloured. No bitterness and no sweetness. Industrial waste? Drink and get drunk thats all.
Koelschtrinker (10710) - Köln (Cologne), GERMANY - JUN 16, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Test vom 8.8.2006, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 6,5,5,5,9,5 - 5,30
Herkybird (21) - YORK, North Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 5, 2009
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
If I had a choice of this or polar bear urine, the bear pee would win. No aroma, thin body, vague malt flavour with faintly metallic hop aftertaste. Disgusting and an insult to the brewer’s art.
Dragonblaze99 (354) - Greater London, ENGLAND - AUG 5, 2009
1.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
No detectable aroma. Medium amber, small head. Sweet malty weak aroma. Watery. finishes with bitter and somewhat yeasty tang. Better than ordinary Foster’s, but then, that is not saying much.
Gary (1397) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - MAY 20, 2009
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Corona would kick this beers arse in a swill fight , before strangeling this beer with a lime. Gosh Fosters is some rank shit. Sweet and harsh. Chemicals and corn.
fonefan (35088) - VestJylland, DENMARK - MAR 19, 2009
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear light to medium yellow color with a small to average, frothy, good lacing, mostly diminishing, white head. Aroma is moderate malty, grain, toasted, cabbage water, corn. Flavor is moderate sweet and light bitter with a average duration. Body is light to medium, texture is oily ot watery, carbonation is soft.