ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAR 22, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Its Bud with some hops, not hops that are all that good, but at least it can be distiguinshed from water (its not neccesarily beter than water, but you can tell them apart.)
Sigmund (6382) - Tau, NORWAY - MAR 22, 2002
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JUN 24, 2003 (330 ml bottle, ABV 4.5%): Light golden colour, large head that doesn't last long. Initial fresh Heineken-like aroma that doesn't linger, bland watery flavour, aftertaste has a little strange and unpleasant bitterness in the end. So boring they could have named it "Neville Chamberlain".
mikeben (355) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - MAR 22, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: FEB 8, 2003 not great. I like the can a lot
Odin (123) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - MAR 20, 2002
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
An overbearing hop taste that makes me wonder why I didnít just order a Michelob.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - MAR 19, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
always tastes somewhat smooth and creamy. slight, slight bitterness. not all that great.
olympian (107) - USA - MAR 18, 2002
2.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
I once had Australian-brewed Fosters. It was better than the current Canadia-brewed version, though in a hard-to-define way (most likely the water). This is mainstream beer, but better than the Miller/Bud stable, bottle or draft.
It is saved from being a bit too sweet by the more noticeably hop content (ALL beer used to be that way, years ago), and I like it, in an everyday sort of way. First thing Iíll buy for everyday use when itís on sale (frequently), but last thing Iíd consider
when I want some excellent beer - and my ímad moneyí is up to it.
jayme9874 (756) - Hamburg, New York, USA - MAR 18, 2002
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: APR 21, 2005 You know, after almost 700 beers, many of them world class, this is not a bad macro, very clean, smooth and quenching.
Gladiator99 (6) - Lancaster, - MAR 18, 2002 does not count
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Get out! What is this doing on this site alongside so many genuine beers? Itís just wrong. Good for getting wasted off - but thatís about it!
neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - MAR 15, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
The taste isnít strong, and that disappears instantly. However, an unpleasant aftertaste is left in the palate. In most pubs there will always be better alternatives.
themorningzoo (49) - Fairbanks, USA - MAR 15, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
As the croc hunter might say íBlimy, you gotta watch for them teeth but really shes a beautí but with no bite.í