RateBeer
overall
4
41
style
Brewed by Fosters Brewing (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager
Southbank, Victoria, Australia

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1856   WEIGHTED AVG: 2/5   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Filtered and pasteurised. Available with added carbon dioxide in keg, can and bottled formats. First brewed in 1887.
Available in Britain as Export.
"A light-coloured lager style, it presents full malt character with a balanced clean hop bitterness. Combined with a slightly hoppy, but yeasty/malty nose, Foster's lager is a full bodied beer with excellent drinkability."


1.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Radek Kliber (6869) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - OCT 8, 2001
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2003 Nope , I dont like it...

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
theslick199 (26) - California, USA - OCT 6, 2001
I was expecting the worst after hearing everyone bash this beer but it turns out I liked it. Nice color and it goes down smooth. Not remarkable enough to drink every day, especially at import prices but not as bad as some people say either.

3.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
Dawghouse Brewers99 (91) - Exeter, California, USA - OCT 5, 2001
Nice clear, clean looking beer. Could use more hops. Very refreshing though.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
psark (54) - Binghamton, New York, USA - OCT 5, 2001
UPDATED: FEB 16, 2007 A refreshing drinking beer in the cream-ale catagory. I wish they would add some hops.

0.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
motelpogo (7706) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 3, 2001
the fosters brewed in australia is even worse than english fosters

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
prpplague (247) - Euless, Texas, USA - SEP 29, 2001
im in the same boat as Harlock, im very neutral over this brew. no bad, not great, just average...

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
weide5599 (48) - NETHERLANDS - SEP 26, 2001

0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
Richard73 (37) - St Albans, ENGLAND - SEP 25, 2001
Feeble, piss water

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
jbeer99 (31) - SWEDEN - SEP 24, 2001
So Brianroz and fraternie, DJ Bird and buffdaddy, these guys and proc thought best to rate this beer twice, such was its fate. But the better job. I must confess, was done by DUFF, and this makes sense, for who would know the beers of OZ as well as duff most surely does. Rating once he thinks it fine but on second thought finds ur-ine. It must be a singular brew that can tear poor Duffs tongue in two!

1.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Brent (116) - Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA - SEP 24, 2001
Light body with nondememo average hops. Well carbonated, but not as fizzy as most North American macro brews. OK with food, as it stays in the background.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 174 175 176  177  178 179 180 » 186


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50