beer_rookie (146) - Arkansas, USA - MAR 28, 2015
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Oil can review
Appearance, I donít like it because the oil can gives a bad pour, I spilled it all over everything. But Iíll rate it a tad higher just because. Very nice beautiful color, and a pretty thick foamy short lived head.
Taste. Well, itís pretty good. Pretty smooth. Pretty drinkable. Mostly grain flavors, although I canít tell what they are.
Mouthfeel is medium light. Slightly slick. Smooth, but slightly bitter finish.
Overall. Itís not a bad beer. Itís better than most people rate it. Iíve had it before and itís better than I remember! Cheers, mate!!
nihtila (1815) - Edinburgh, SCOTLAND - MAR 26, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
18.10.2014. 4.7% version. Pours golden with white head. Aroma and taste have some grain, grass and light malts and hops. Light. Basic.
Obfuscate (290) - Minneapolis, - MAR 25, 2015
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Been a while since I had a Fosters oil can and will probably be even longer before I have another.
YantarCoast (508) - Moscow, RUSSIA - MAR 25, 2015
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
330ml can, tried in Kyoto, Japan in early May 2014. Pours gold with a small white head. Malty aroma. Standard thin bodied lager that is drinkable if cold enough. Canít remember if this is better or worse than the UK version.
McSherman (339) - North Rhine-Westphalia, GERMANY - MAR 16, 2015
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bewertung importiert von Bier index:
6 / 6 / 5 / 5 / 6 / 4 / 3 / 6 / 55
willisread (917) - Tokyo, JAPAN - MAR 8, 2015
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Faint hoppy aroma present. Clear golden yellow color. Lots of carbonation. Not any flavor to speak about at all. Watery.
pricey290483 (690) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - FEB 27, 2015
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
not for me not much in the aroma normal mass produced taste but very cheap and easy to find
panzerwolf (199) - FINLAND - FEB 21, 2015
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours clear gold. Slight bit of bitterness, some malts, but overall a kind of watery kind of beer that doesnít really bother you or impress you. Tinge of bitterness is nice, though.
teromous (119) - - FEB 16, 2015
2.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Review of one of the large cans.
Appearance: Perfectly transparent with a bright golden colored body under a thick fluffy head that stands up for a long time. Great visible carbonation. It looks perfect.
Aroma: Mild spicy hop aroma and that familiar lager tinge. I can clearly pick out the spicy hop aroma though.
Taste: Iím literally picking up no flavor at all. Thereís a bit of a cereal flavor at the end, but even that is watered down. It really does taste just like water. I wonít give it a 1 because it doesnít taste disgusting, it literally just has no flavor...and Iím not saying that to be mean. Iím looking for flavor of any kind and I get none.
Mouthfeel: Itís crisp but it doesnít give much presence in the mouth. Average at best.
Overall: Skip this beer. An adjunct lager does not mean the beer has to be flavorless, which this is. I recommend passing on it.
kevinator (1431) - The Colony, Texas, USA - FEB 15, 2015
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sadly, this beer falls into the same unexciting category of most pale lagers. No real aroma with a slight hint of corn. Unattractive light yellow color with a lot of effervescence. Light watery palate. Taste was bland and slightly grainy with hints of corn or rice. Better than most American macros, but thatís not saying much.