Brandon123 (19) - - SEP 16, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
simple too light and watery for a beer...mind as well go for a soft drink ...no kick at all...really waste of money.
DavidAust (13) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - APR 29, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Donít let the marketing fool you - Australians generally donít drink this, unless they are super young / new to beer, or buy their beer based on price (even then it is not high on the list), or extremely homesick when travelling abroad. Hadnít even seen it on the shelves here for years and when it returned I was given a six pack of cans for nostalgiaís sake.
Best thing about the beer is the label.
Mass produced larger with little or no taste (or a bad taste if served too warm), tastes identical to most other Australian mass produced beers. In fact I often wonder if Fosters and Crown larger are the same product in different packaging so a premium can be charged for Crown.
bennetporter (223) - East Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA - APR 6, 2015
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pours a straw from a can. Adjunct-y sweet corniness. You either like it or you donít I guess.
OmegaX (1326) - Florida, USA - APR 5, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Fosters on draft paired with a nice burger. Not a bad combo. Itís your standard pale lager, easy to drink, lower carb, grassy hops and some grainy malt.
Lemke10 (864) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - APR 3, 2015
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
On-tap, this pours a clear golden yellow color with a slight head. The aroma is light with malts and grains. The taste is thin, light, with a decent grain flavor. Easy drinking, perhaps too easy to drink.
beer_rookie (68) - Arkansas, USA - MAR 28, 2015
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Oil can review
Appearance, I donít like it because the oil can gives a bad pour, I spilled it all over everything. But Iíll rate it a tad higher just because. Very nice beautiful color, and a pretty thick foamy short lived head.
Taste. Well, itís pretty good. Pretty smooth. Pretty drinkable. Mostly grain flavors, although I canít tell what they are.
Mouthfeel is medium light. Slightly slick. Smooth, but slightly bitter finish.
Overall. Itís not a bad beer. Itís better than most people rate it. Iíve had it before and itís better than I remember! Cheers, mate!!
nihtila (1391) - Edinburgh, SCOTLAND - MAR 26, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
18.10.2014. 4.7% version. Pours golden with white head. Aroma and taste have some grain, grass and light malts and hops. Light. Basic.
Obfuscate (230) - Minneapolis, - MAR 25, 2015
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Been a while since I had a Fosters oil can and will probably be even longer before I have another.
YantarCoast (377) - Moscow, RUSSIA - MAR 25, 2015
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
330ml can, tried in Kyoto, Japan in early May 2014. Pours gold with a small white head. Malty aroma. Standard thin bodied lager that is drinkable if cold enough. Canít remember if this is better or worse than the UK version.
McSherman (259) - North Rhine-Westphalia, GERMANY - MAR 16, 2015
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bewertung importiert von Bier index:
6 / 6 / 5 / 5 / 6 / 4 / 3 / 6 / 55
willisread (514) - Tokyo, JAPAN - MAR 8, 2015
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Faint hoppy aroma present. Clear golden yellow color. Lots of carbonation. Not any flavor to speak about at all. Watery.