 GMUcrew7 (158), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Apr 27, 2008
25 oz can. Aroma and appearance are typical cheap pale lager. Flavor is slightly better, somewhat malty, basically a less sweet, slightly better bud.
blipp (599), Grand Island, New York, USA
Jul 25, 2008 Bottle. Pours light gold with a white head. Aroma has grain, malt, and a bit of hops. Light body. Lightly sweet malt flavor, with grain and some trace hoppy notes. Not nearly as bad as I thought it would be.
Todeon (146), Höllviken, Sweden
Jul 22, 2008 Bottle. Kind of different aroma with some fresh hops notes. Taste is refreshing with lots of malt and also some pommac notes.
joebudzjoe (80), USA
Jul 16, 2008 One of the best macro pale lagers. Noticeable malt and slight hop flavors with a clean refreshing taste. In my opinion, more enjoyable than Bud or Heiniken.
MrBeerFanatic (189), jamestown, New York, USA
Jul 13, 2008 Bottle. Its actually not as bad as many other massed produced beer. Its got kind of a sweet lightly malty taste but nothing really else except a little skunkyness. I like it better than bud, labatt, bush and other big companies....
note666 (163), Eindhoven, Netherlands
Jul 12, 2008 had it on holiday in England 07-07’08. 500 ml can. yellow colour. small white head. watery weaty tatste.
|
