ttutony (772) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 19, 2010
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Copper color, looks decent. Smells and tastes like there is a decent amount of adjunct grain in the mix though too. Was hoping for something a little better.
Chudwick (2438) - Cincyucky, Kentucky, USA - JAN 13, 2012
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Oil can - pours light amber with quickly diminishing off-white head. Nose is bread. Aroma is a hoppy nightmare and spoiled malts. taste is poorly balanced with a fusion of sweetness and cringing bitterness. This is horrible, barely drinkable, but still horrible. I motion to have the word "premium" removed from the name and label.
ghawener (1522) - San Salvador, EL SALVADOR - DEC 28, 2012
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can: Slight malty presence, far from an EPA. Drinkable. Food Pairing: Enchiladas bien picantes!
alcaponejunior (438) - Texas, USA - JAN 2, 2013
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Golden with a white head that faded fast, leaving little lace.
Aroma isn’t anything like what I’d hope to find in an ESB, or any other beer for that matter. Funky and carpet like, with some alcohol and slightly moldy deer-corn.
Taste is close to a drainpour, even for a canned after work at your construction job type of beer. Just bitter funky corn, stale grains, some metallic flavors.
Body isn’t that great either. Kinda like fosters lager, but without the flavor or willingness to finish the whole can.
I’ll pass on having this one again.
Cbuk1013 (246) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - JUN 2, 2013
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
It’s a decent beer up front, and pretty cheap for an import. Has a weird lingering aftertaste.
rdixon77 (1581) - Georgia, USA - APR 12, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Old rating. Thin Amber. Corn, caramel, generally cardboardiness. Pretty gross.
MOboy (505) - Kansas City, Missouri, USA - OCT 20, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Why is this so carbonated? Anyway, this is a bad beer. what else can I say that its score doesn’t.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - JUN 12, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Nice darkish colour but that’s about it. No real aroma and only very slight malt and bitterness in the flavour. I didn’t think they still made this so I picked this up at Quaffers. Ok so it was a mistake.
CBCPaleAle (73) - Ohio, USA - OCT 28, 2004
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
How can they advertise this as an ale. Hard to differentiate this from the regular. I suppose it is a bit bitter on the finish, but I found the difference to be pretty negligible. Don’t waste your time.
Scubatrip (605) - Annandale, Virginia, USA - APR 12, 2006
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
From the big ass can, bitter and bland is all I have to say about this one. Really light, and bitter hops (more bitter than hoppy). I prefer regular Fosters to this one, but it’s not terrible.