2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours a clear pale gold color with a thin white head. Boring aroma and flavor of malt and citrus. The body is light with a watery texture and moderate carbonation.
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
very light, easy to drink, great with food, and my wife liked it. if you like light beer, you’ll like this. if you don’t, you’ll still enjoy this one a bit.
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This is interesting, while I can’t say it tastes like a typical light beer, it does just basically taste like a decent pale lager. I guess there is some value there, but it is boring as are most pale lagers.
3.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Tasted as part of sampler, may revise rating when tasted from bottle. For a light lager, OUTSTANDING. But then again, I’m used to the relatively flavorless "lite" beer offerings. The aroma and appearance are along the same lines, maybe a slightly deeper golden color. But the flavor is far better than what I was expecting for a light lager.
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Draught, light yellow, average lacing, slight floral smell, slight bitterness and dry finish, run of the mill beer.
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Tap. Pale yellow color. White head. Hoppy aroma. A thinner version of the Pilsner methinks. Very dry and hoppy finish.
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAY 4, 2005 For a brewery that just reopened after a tornado destroyed it, a great beer. This is a re-introduction of a beer they discontinued in the 30’s. For a low carb light beer this should be the standard. Loads of flavor and a nice nose. Has a good finish with some floral present. Hard to find for now but I will make the 60 mile trek to get some cases. Some bottles have to much sediment and leaves a bad taste.
|
