 grimreeser (797), Minnesota, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Sep 16, 2006 Their weakest offering, intended for the macro drinkers. Not much aroma, some honey, but tasted mostly like water, seemed thin. Most people reading this would probably be happier with one of their other brews.
jtxx (141), san antonio, Texas, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Mar 14, 2005 I might have been sitting next to kaggie and pounder? Honey cream was not a good effort. Some hint of honey, but it’s an ok beer to walk around with on a hot day.
PorterPounder (3148), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 13, 2005 On tap at the brewpub - pours a dark orange with a light white head. Aroma has some faint fresh lake accents. The flavor has some slight sweet honey notes, but not much else. Very smooth drinking, nut nothing to get excited about. Mouthfeel is not very creamy, in fact it turns a bit metallic near the end. Probably the weakest of the five I had on my visit.
KAggie97 (2485), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Feb 12, 2005 Updated: Mar 29, 2005A nice, tasty little brew that is best enjoyed after a day at E Rock. Sweet, slippery, and satisfying- the honey is just noticeable enough, with the hops holding it back nicely.
FtWorthBrew (105), Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Aug 19, 2003 One of the better beers from FBC. No idea wh they bill it as a light beer drinkers beer; It is not light at all but does have a sweet flavour taht any drinker can enjoy
Andrew196 (1091), Katy, Texas, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Dec 2, 2002 This beer is billed as one that light beer drinkers would like....that made me expect some watery, adjunct crap. On the contrary, this beer actually had a decent, sweet flavor with an excellent hop finish.
LaChad (1375), San Francisco, California, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Dec 1, 2002 I have to admit that I wasn’t expecting much based on the last line of the commercial description. But I found the slight hoppy-honey taste pretty decent, with just enough flavor to keep things interesting. Being 4.7%, it’s not really a light beer by anyone’s definition, but I’d drink it again.
|
Find This Beer (Want/Have)