bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - APR 10, 2006
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
they keep changing the label on full sail. i guess i like what they have decided on for now. country scene of nature around the neck of the bottle is nice. this poured golden brown with a small white head that didnt realy develop or last. nose of thin hops and cut grass. flavor spills over into mostly hop flavored water that turn metallic without the appropriate amt of roasted malt to compete.. thin backbone. but easy drinkn beer.
elduchey (12) - Venice, California, USA - APR 28, 2006
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Is something wrong with this IPA or have I just been spoiled. It looks good, smells good and even taste good but for some reason it’s just a little off.
This could be a great beer.
trokini (1025) - San Diego, California, USA - APR 3, 2006
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
An okay IPA. Orange-gold pour with a good head. Claims to be very hoppy, but doesn’t follow through. Its all there, just not that strong. Dry finish.
sneagrams3 (2337) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - MAR 21, 2006
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
12oz bottle. Orangy, citrus aroma. Clear and deep golden. Zesty, peppery. Smooth with a long crisp drying.
GeoDoc (34) - San Antonio, Texas, USA - MAR 25, 2006
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Beautiful rich golden-orange color that almost glows. Aroma, taste, and mouthfeel are all a bit light, which is dissapointing after such an eyeful. Overall, not the best IPA, but a very drinkable beer.
roner77 (35) - Portland, Oregon, USA - MAR 13, 2006
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Is this an IPA? Certainly much weaker and bitter than almost all ofther PNW IPAs. I found the flavor to be average and lacking any distinction and the it seems they went light on the hops. An IPA made for people who don’t like bitterness or hops in my opinion. Second rate.
SpringsLicker (3251) - Tennessee, USA - APR 7, 2006
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
This red tinged golden brew throws up a tall head of creamy white that sticks around for a good bit before easing down.
The aroma is fruity with a bit of yeast and a subtle blend of malt and hops.
Dry palate in which the malt never blossoms with a long bitter finish. A bit out of balance.
Thanks to droopy49 for this.
thoreaubred (42) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 6, 2006
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
For a decent brewery, this is a pretty mediocre IPA. Lack of complexity and something just off about it. Pretty hoppy but not in a good way.
jackamackson (127) - USA - MAR 12, 2006
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
clear light amber pour, frothy white head. lots of pine/grass hops in the aroma. very clean tasting with some good earthy notes, with crisp hoppy finish. a great IPA.
ragesaq (71) - Arizona, USA - MAR 17, 2006
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pretty weak for an IPA compared to any of the ’big’ IPAs like Stone, Alesmith, Great Divide, Dogfish, etc. But still, not a bad IPA, not too expensive. I could see ’beer newbs’ breaking their teeth on this before stepping up to better beers.