aobecksy (700) - Middle of no where, Ohio, USA - JAN 11, 2003
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: JUN 25, 2007 1996. Pleasing to look at, yet need a whole night to ingest true flavor. Soft undertones makes it irresistable, yet very comfortable. Impossible to stop at one. A drink to stay home for; definately a prize--rerated now that my pallete is use to partaking in better fine beers. I recollect on this one often while tasting, so it must be more memorable than my rating reflected.
Schroppfy (2360) - Łódż, Warsaw, Poland; Michigan, Ohio, USA - JAN 10, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JAN 3, 2004 #700. 1996 bottle. Not the easy beer to drink, or wait, maybe it is. Delightful...begs out for leather chairs and dusty rooms and overcooked vegetables...all things English. Incredible sour black cherry flavors. Delicious. Musty. Prized. Rubenesque.
Crit (3393) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - JAN 7, 2003
3.9 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
No head, visually unappealing. Great malt nose. Complex fruity dry malt flavor. This is a good one.
TheBeerGod (5336) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - JAN 6, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
This was different. I had a 2001 vintage. I know, I know. I should have waited to taste it. It has a dark brown color to it. The taste reminded me of a bitter or sour apple. It seemed kind of smooth on the palate but was very bitter. I don’t know how aged bottles taste, but this wasn’t as overpowering as I hoped. I have another bottle that I will definitely age for several years before drinking and then re-rate.
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - DEC 28, 2002
4.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
I tried a 1998 bottling in early 2002. This is one of the beers that put me onto "big" beers and unusual styles. It looks like very old, used motor oil. Opaque brown, no head to speak of, and not much carbonation. Spectacular flavor, unhindered by effervescence, so smooth everything melds together into an almost wine-like quality. Body is very big, with rich maltiness and a subtle british hopping within. What an amazing beer.
Trappist (284) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - DEC 27, 2002
4.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
My liquor store just started carrying this, and I am glad. I have looked for this brew for a while and I am very pleased with it. Great flavor, my bottle was a 97, and It added to the quailty of this ale. Two thumbs up!
sleepdirt (169) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - DEC 23, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Similiar to wine at first,very tart citrus start--grainy aftertaste. I like Belgian triple better.
Hoss (607) - Florida, USA - DEC 21, 2002
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Complex and yet simple, It had a slightly bitter finish with a middle strength body.
CaptainCougar (7132) - Columbia, Maryland, USA - NOV 30, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JUN 9, 2003 1997 Vintage (8,3,8,4,15): Pours a dark brown with absolutely no carbonation. The aroma is of soy and caramel. The onset of flavor is watery, but gets more complex toward the finish. It has an interesting oily mouthfeel with sherry-like characteristics. A slightly malty, oaky palate and sour notes contribute to a lightly bitter caramel malt finish. The oldest beer I have ever tried, and I just bought it. Not exceptional, but worth having at least once.
Re-rate 1999 vintage (7,3,7,4,15): Much like the first with a sweet and mellow caramel malt aroma. Glowing copper ruby with strands of bubbles. Body is thicker than the '97 and a little sweeter, but not as complex.
Drinkingdan (375) - East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 27, 2002
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Smelled like wine and even tasted like it too. I thought it was very different and worht the try.