hotstuff (4802) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - APR 2, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
1999 bottle.This was anything but a good beer experience.Yuck is all I can say about this beer.No "thedm" it definitely did not pass the GF test!!
thedm (5495) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - APR 2, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JUN 4, 2003 This bottle was labeled from year 1999. It had a very interesting aroma. Its aroma was different than I have smelled thus far. It was hard to describe. Initial reaction to the aroma is, "What the devil is this?” It poured no head at all with a very thick cloudy dark brown body. It left no lacing at all. Tastes like wine, perhaps grapes. No real fore taste and some bitterness in the after taste. It is failing the GF test and she may not drink it all. You can definitely taste the alcohol in this brew. It is definitely a different kind of brew. But not one I would buy again.
motelpogo (7705) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - MAR 29, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
provoked a response in me much like when i tried cantillon for the first time - wincing and wondering what on earth this is. dried apricots in vinegar
daboskabouter (1470) - Fergus, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 26, 2003
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: DEC 16, 2003 Second Rating: Dark hazy ruby color, light brown foamy head. The nose is alcohol and light fruit with a touch of phenols - also some medicinal cherry notes with a hint of cork. Alcoholic on the tongue, cherry notes with a hint of dark fruit. Smooth with a touch of leather, drying towards the end and getting a little more tart with hints of cork. Nice old ale, could use a bit of age, but not too much because, as my previous rating attests to, this beer can go off a bit with too much age.
First Rating 2.1: Hazy dark brown color. Nose is tart and dusty with impressions of cork. The body was spritzy with a sweet tartness and impressions of wood. Came across as somewhat medicinal and ends with a light bitterness. I think passed its prime in terms of aging. I'll have to try a new bottle some time.
Radek Kliber (7058) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - MAR 22, 2003
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: FEB 22, 2004 Brown in look, slightly ruby-plumy hue. Smallish head. Quiet, sweet light aroma notes, once again plums. Sweet almost port like, dried plum fruity base, mixed with malty sugars. Alcohol is well hidden under all that sugary blanket. Medium body, slightly oily, wine like medium dry finish.
joeycapps (1468) - Waterdown, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 20, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not sure whether or not to rate this beer as it had seemed to have oxidized but its quality seems to be variable at best so here goes. Hazy apple cider brown w/ fizzy head. Tart, sour apple aroma. Medium bodied. Flavour is sour, yeasty, & slightly acidic.
nstal (237) - Houston, Texas, USA - MAR 20, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
1996, #7367. Pours murky, dark, brown. Head=0. Very sweet aroma, very sweet. Bottle boasts 9% ABV, I wouldn't doubt if that's increased some since '96. Earns bonus points for the wine-like cork.
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - MAR 19, 2003
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
I had bottle #7327 from the 1996 vintage. This beer pours into the glass with an opaque dark brown body with no head or lace. Slightly sweet syrupy aroma with strong alcohol notes and rubbery accents. Aroma is similar to baking fruitcake. Very sour malty flavor with a sour slightly smokey finish. Full bodied and relatively smooth with a warming feeling.
clvand0 (350) - Lexington, Kentucky, USA - MAR 19, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer pours with no head because there is no carbonation - it is corked instead of sealed with a cap. The aroma has a bit of cherries or grapes in it. The taste was that of a very watered down version of a dark polish beer. I did not like this beer as it was a whole lot like whine mixed with bourbon.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - MAR 18, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Sampled a 1997 bottle and 1998 on draft. Pours deep red and mostly lifeless (more head from cask than from bottle). Bottle had some sour cherry flavors at the back that the cask version didn't. Lot's of black pepper and spices in this. Palate was very vinous. Finish was dry and very rough on the tongue like a whiskey. I liked it a lot, but would hesitate to have it again.