keanex (1452) - Atco, New Jersey, USA - FEB 25, 2014
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Canning codes are all weird.
Appearance: The body is crystal clear with a pale golden hue. The head is dense and foamy, slightly messy with a white hue.
Aroma: A slight whiff of skunk, despite being in a can, corn, and a sulfury background coming off as eggs and matches. Not very appealing.
Taste: Not as offensive as the aroma, but this is sweet adjunct through and through.
Palate: Almost full-bodied but lacking in carbonation for the style.
Overall: This is a beer I could drink if I werenít thinking about it, but overall itís rather bad. The aroma is harsh and the flavor lacks any crispness, itís just sweet adjunct.
BeerFunGuy (642) - California, USA - FEB 25, 2014
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A pretty typical lager. It has some more flavor than an American lager but is still pretty plain.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
jcnielsen (2100) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - FEB 22, 2014
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle at El Paraiso in Cornelius. Pours a light yellow color with white head. Corn, straw, pils, grainy flavors. Pretty light lager. Meh.
Rperez (134) - Florida, USA - FEB 7, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I think this beer is a lot safer than regular Guatemalan water, but not much flavor here, an average light lager
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
574deadzone (1040) - North Central, Indiana, USA - JAN 30, 2014
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
As "Famosa" here in the states. Pours a very pale golden with some floating flakes of sediment and a fair, bubbly white head that settles to a film and a ring, leaving just a couple lace spots. Nose involves soft bubblegum, some husky grain, a touch of mint, and not much else. Somewhat sweet, very lightly bitter. Extremely light bodied, fair carb, a bit watery, with a fairly clean and lightly doughy finish. Nothing offensive here. Nothing necessarily interesting either. Iíd probably go for Schlitz before this, but itís ok.
coyforce (608) - Virginia, USA - JAN 10, 2014
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Nothing special about this brew. Pretty watery and forgettable. Pour is very thin colored and no head.
Masterkush7 (507) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 10, 2013
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Taste of a cheap macro lager. But I sure enjoyed them when I was in Guatemala.
jackl (4596) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - OCT 26, 2013
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This quality rate was supplied by the fine folks at Beer Run. The pourís clear gold with a modest white head that quickly settles. The nose is white bread, newspaper, a bit of honey. The taste is green apple, pear, honey. Soft grain. Light body, fine carbonation. Overall, not nearly as terrible as I was afraid it might be.
Block (1400) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - OCT 13, 2013
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This beer was very refreshing in the context of a fantastic Mexican lunch. Light, macro, flavor.
SamP01 (565) - New Jersey, USA - SEP 13, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Poured a pale yellow with a medium white head. Aroma and taste of grains and cereal, corn and light fruity notes. A light body with moderate carbonation, a bit watery. Finish the same as taste with a bit of a bitter grain ending. Best served cold and drink fast, as it warmed up aroma and taste begin to deteriorate. There are a lot of good brews out there, this is not one of them.