RateBeer

General Generic Beer

Percentile
0
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
250.78/5.01.19/5.0-1.9Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Contract-brewed for Pabst Brewing (San Antonio).
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 REDDOGICE (202), nantucket, Massachusetts, USA
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Mar 12, 2007  
Putrid, Insipid,rancid, decayed, rotten. Those are just a few of the words to describe this bad bad beer


Dixon (31), Iowa, USA
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Jan 4, 2007  
I a can of this beer once... and I do mean once. I am irritated that the total score can not go lower than 0.5, because this beer does not deserve such a high ranking.


 Louipa (121), USA
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Dec 1, 2006  
Don’t they think It might be a smart thing to do to name the beer something other than general generic beer. Thats messed up.


 Bartzilla (443), San Diego, California, USA
0.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/105/51/101/51/20
May 22, 2006  
Never knew this was made by Pabst. That explains everything. I guess being generic, you’re not supposed to know these key details. They drank a lot of this stuff in "Repo Man", which is one fine film, so we score a rack of it one night and it tasted exactly as we had anticipated it would taste. Awful. Then again, I won’t complain because this is a joke beer. Gets a 5 for appearance just for the can alone.


 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/52/101/54/20
Aug 1, 2004  
Light golden color,small white head that faded quickly to leave little behind.The aroma was light at best with a mild malt thin hops and a sort of corn like sweetness.The flavor came off much the same as the aroma with a slight metallic side and very thin bodied with barely a hint of hops.Definately a bad brew that you’d expect to have a few qualities of a macro but this one misses the mark.


 mohawksin (187), Nebraska, USA
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/53/102/53/20
Jun 23, 2004  
It’s bad. For crying out loud, it’s GENERIC!! Generic already means crap. If you buy something, or get something free, that says GENERIC, you cannot expect something good. So, if you ever have this, you know to expect something bad.


DeltaBlues (8), Cordova, Tennessee, USA
does not count click to see why this rating of General Generic Beer  does not count
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
May 19, 2004    Updated: May 20, 2004
Well, the nostalgia makes it a fond memory. I grew up in Yakima, WA, and when Mt. St. Helens erupted in 1980 my dad ran to the store. He came back with lots of TP and BEER beer. Being 16 and not caring how anything tasted I stole enough from his 3-4 cases to get a buzz, and of course doing it in such an underhanded way made it better. I graduated from that to Lucky Lager, Heidelberg, Rainier, Olympia, Schmidt and then Schlitz Bull. High School was full of great times and crappy, crappy beer. Oh, as for BEER beer, I remember it being slightly darker than creek water, musky, watery, grainy like the stuff in a cattle trough, zero hop taste, but with a foamy head that lasted about 3 seconds.


 garrison (455), Cin. city, Ohio, USA
1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/52/20
Aug 17, 2003  
It's vile pondwater with a skunky, aluminum aftertaste. Yes, it's cheap and, yes. it's vile!



CONSIDER FREE RATEBEER MEMBERSHIP



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

SIGN UP NOW »

View Page 1 2 3


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC