MrBeerFanatic (977) - Friona, Texas, USA - AUG 15, 2008
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Has almost a faint aroma of a barely and lacks anything. Watered down and almost tastless, except for a slight nuttyness that is very faint. An easy beer to chug.
Odyn (266) - New York, USA - MAY 26, 2008
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
An awful beer by any standards. Virtually undrinkable. It smells the same going in as it does coming out. Sort of a watery and bitter nastiness. A must to avoid, unless you are already in the bag.
jredmond (7241) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 14, 2008
2.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
12 oz can.. 6 pack for $5 bones. Label informs me that "light beer never tasted so real." I must have been trapped in the matrix. Light beer, a little crispy.
502Che (999) - @, CAMBODIA - APR 12, 2008
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
My frat friend from rochester brought this garbage to school for us. I figured it was bad, and it was. I would rather have a Keystone, maybe even a Natty Light.
blipp (7898) - San Diego, California, USA - APR 5, 2008
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle. Pours light yellow with a white head. Aroma is malt and grain. Watery body. Flavor is very light malt and tin. Pretty bad, but the flavor is so light that it’s at least drinkable.
HughConway (830) - Washington, USA - FEB 27, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Like water. Little color, little taste, little aroma, little alcohol. You could drink it all day , but dear god why?
cheap (5152) - Beaver Valley, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 4, 2008
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
Does anyboby remember the original gennesee light circa 1976? The can was a pretty blue with an odd label. This is s 16 oz can. Processed pale lager aroma. Pale lager appearance, with barely any visible carbonation. However, one taste and the fizziness is readily apparent on the tongue even tho it fades quickly after each swig. Seems to have more alky in it than the 3.6% listed here, No way is this less than 4%, I get a wandering feeling just after one can. Taste follows in the footsteps of the aroma. Rather industrial in flavor yet does not insult. Leaves an odd pale lager after taste on the finish. Fifty cents for a 16 oz can in eastern ohio.
cking (1175) - North Canton, Ohio, USA - JAN 20, 2008
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Big ol’ can from my neighbor’s refrigerator. Ugh, decent for a light beer but not so great in the grand scheme of things. Isn’t much of an aroma some light grassy notes. Nice pale gold pour with a lasting creamy white head and some solid sticky lacing...way to go. Airy and empty to the palate, there is nothing. Malt and hops are at a minimum, but they are noticed. Bland, but so-so for a light beer, unsatisfying.
radagast83 (6962) - Fairfax, Virginia, USA - NOV 18, 2007
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
I’m not sure if this beer is a somewhat new introduction to my area, or if the beer is just that bad that it’s nearly impossible to find. Like the "regular" version of this beer, it’s a pale lager with the texture of carbonated soda, and about the same potency. It’s not a good sign if the most common box you can find this in is a case.
Bcoble003 (286) - Aiea, Hawaii, USA - NOV 3, 2007
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
nothing special just a simple pale beer any high school college student drinks at a party.