BMMillsy (1756) - Florida, USA - OCT 12, 2012
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
Smells of wet dog. Malt ovcerpower much of the hops for a pale. Copper colored, and a sweet, caramel taste. Only okay.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Shink (177) - Portland, Oregon, USA - OCT 12, 2012
3.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Growler from Uptown!!! Pours a darker pale color with a solid white head. Smell is hoppy and amazing. The taste is well balanced. I tried Lucille and didnít like it as much as this one! They donít bottle so you better find a tap somewhere!
DuffMan (7999) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - OCT 11, 2012
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
On tap at some pub after watching the Seahawks crush the Cowboys. I think the pub was called The Owl or something? I donít recall because we pretty much ditched it right away and hiked up to Pike. Anyway, this was a hazy light amber number with an average white head. Aroma was a bit stinky/sweaty (but Iím betting it was the taplines in this place) with sweet fruity notes. Sweet caramel and vaguely defined fruity hops with medium bitterness. Just okay.
troopie (2291) - Munchen an der Willamette, Oregon, USA - SEP 20, 2012
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Much cloudier pour than I expected with a thin white head. Modest lacing. Full floral hop aroma. Medium bodied, more forest, almost but not not quite an IPA. Lekker hop finish
elizabethmarie (37) - - SEP 19, 2012
4.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
I am the type of person that does not get excited about pale ales but mannyís is absolutely the exception.
shadey (1996) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - AUG 20, 2012
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
On tap at the brewery. Apparently this is the most popular of the Georgetown offerings. (note of trivia - Georgetown brewery is the second largest tap-only brewery in the U.S.) From the ratings, it appears that the recipe varies here and there. The version that I tried was nicely put-together, but very straightforward and not a lot of hops. It had a nice body to it, and drank very easily. Iím just disappointed with the lack of complexity to the aromas/flavors.
OWENSR1 (11) - Washington, USA - SEP 13, 2012
4.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
Apparently Iím supposed to fill this out. Take the numbers that I put down with a grain of salt if you will, but Iím just your average NW beer junkie looking to sample as many different brews as possible.
Aml42000 (622) - Washington, USA - SEP 13, 2012
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
All around decent pale ale. Orange body with a slight white head. Muted floral aromatics with a hint of citrus. Light to medium bodied with similar flavors to the nose. High carbonation, abrupt finish.
JoeMcPhee (9004) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 6, 2012
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Tap at Sirenís, Port Townsend. Amber golden pour with a tight white head. The aroma is softly fruity and a little bit earthy. An unusual sort of tart red berry flavour. Definitely in the UK-ish style. A bit of light blackberry flavour and a little bit of soft bitterness. Okay - but not awesome.
ryecatcher (1017) - Bridgeport, Chicago, Illinois, USA - AUG 26, 2012
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Solid offering, on tap at a bar downtown Seattle. Nice, orangey-gold color, florally and earthy, finishes nice. Drank several pints of this and would do it again.