1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Very pale gold color, with minimal aromas of pale malt and hopcitrus. Also a watery palate and lack of flavor.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
very pale looking, light and watery, a bit grassy of a flavour, not much pleasing about this brew.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
On tap at the Golden Avalance Brew Pub. Poured a light straw color with a smaller sized white head. Aromas and tastes of grain with a very light grassiness to the taste. Thin and overall weak (hey, its a Pale Lager).
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
on tap-pours a white head and body is yellow in color. Aroma is grain. Taste is light grain, mild, refreshing. Again, finishes with a flatness.
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
11.05.04 I wonder why they even made this beer. Maybe it was to show that anyone really can make a bad light beer? We may never know. Golden Avalanche you can do better. Don’t give in to the evil
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Water? Yes. Thats about it. Carbonated water. Nothing more to say at all.
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I didn’t think a decent microbrewery could brew such a horrible & mass-marketed-type of beer but Golden Avalanche did, and it’s just as horrible as the big breweries offerings of the "low-carb/low-cal" styles, straw & yellow in color, no head, lots of corn in the nose, lots of corn & rice flavors, harsh palate, not drinkable at all
|
