temporrari (385) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - FEB 15, 2004
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: OCT 5, 2005 Not bad. Tastes similar to Sam Adams. Some more hop flavor though. Smooth and drinkable.
haddon90 (1492) - Denver, Colorado, USA - FEB 13, 2004
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A nice Pale Ale. Clear copper color with a slim off-white head. Nice mild hoppy aroma, with a smooth...not so shockingly hoppy taste. Well balanced, and a nice brew. Had this in the C Concourse at Chicago O'Hare International Airport.
Gmku (294) - Iowa City, Iowa, USA - FEB 4, 2004
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I had this on tap in Chicago and then from the bottle in Iowa City and then on tap in Iowa City. The Iowa City waiter said it was the best beer he'd had in a long time. Poor bastard. I liked it a lot in Chicago and not so much in Iowa City in either form. On tap in Chicago it was creamy and delicious, just hopped so and slightly sweet. The Iowa City experiences were overly bitter and rather flavorless. Haven't been able to touch the stuff since, and it's scared me off their other products.
oli (108) - DENMARK - FEB 3, 2004
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I enjoyed this beer.Nice head and decent body and taste.A beer i could drink alot of.
hershiser2 (1232) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - FEB 2, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer is above average, but nothing overly special. Not much to say about this beer: simple amber/copper color, a bit of a flowery aroma, decent taste (though it might not be if you stayed with it all night). Mouthfeel was not bad, but I've had better. It's a drinkable beer, but might get filling after a few.
becksgenius (110) - Illinois, USA - JAN 24, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
can;t say that i have ever tried drinking urine, but if i were to drink it i would imagine it would taste quite a bit like his brew. the warmer this stuff gets, the more it taste like a scoop out of a urinal.
NickS (4) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 22, 2004 does not count
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
one of my favorites, strong taste for its paleness, kinda fruity with a strong hops aftertaste, wish it had a little more head
5000 (6299) - Hardened Liver, Washington, USA - JAN 17, 2004
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2004 Bottle pours an amber color with very little carbonation. Smells of sweetness & cat urine. Virtually no lacing or head. Luckily the taste is better than its aroma. Mild hopiness up front, but the finish is slightly roasted and flat. Nothing I'd write home about.
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - JAN 16, 2004
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Firkin at Brewpub: I was never a fan of the Honker's Ale, but the wood sapped some of the hops out of the beer. Yes, they dry-hopped it with additional Styrians, but they add more to the aroma and less to the flavor, so I'd say the Honkers Deluxe is a more-pleasant variant of the standard Honker's Ale. Nice.
Earlier Rating: 12/25/2002 Total Score: 3.2
What a savory aroma! They really got that right. Now for the taste....um, well, itís not quite as terrific as the nose, but itís still clearly a quality APA. Bitter only in the aftertaste, so if you like a hop monster, this ainít it. How weird that this is sold in Texas, of all places.
r464 (1946) - Earth, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 10, 2004
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Nice amber colored ale with a quickly disappearing head. Definite fruitiness with some character but not too strong. A good session ale.