dmschefke (568) - Macomb, Michigan, USA - APR 24, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is what it is. A lager designed for the masses. It does the job, but not something I care to have if I donít have to.
thedm (4935) - Fort Wayne, USA - MAR 21, 2008
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This draft brew from the brewery poured a medium sized head of foamy finely sized white colored bubbles that were long lasting and left behind a transparent softly carbonated and a poor lacing. The mild aroma was mild hop and dough. The semi-thick semi-flat smooth mouth feel was weakly tingly at the start and at the finish. The flavor contained notes of malt and floral. An OK brew just nothing special.
hotstuff (4069) - Indiana, USA - MAR 20, 2008
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Draft at GBBC.Small white head that mostly diminished, patchy lacing, transparent, very little carbonation, and a yellow golden hue. Nose was malty, lightly hoppy and crisp.Ditto for the flavor.Smooth mouthfeel and light in body.Quaffable, balanced, easy drinking, nothing very special about this beer.
Styles (2014) - Lincoln Park, Michigan, USA - JAN 22, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Tap: see Wohlfs below..... then I will add after she said she didnít like any beer there (including this one obviously) she proceeded to the beer she drinks is Miller Lite. hmmmm?
11026 (1772) - Alabama, USA - JAN 22, 2005
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Tap. Light yellow in color. Thin white head. Spicy hop nose. Dry on the finish. Not horrible. This was introduced by our server as their version of Miller. She then informed us that she didnít like any beer there. Saleswoman of the year I say.