TheEnemy (562) - Chicago, USA - JAN 7, 2007
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a clear very pale yellow; almost no color at all. Medium white head that leaves some decent lacing. No aroma to speak of save a wisp of sour-grass. Quite a lot of flavor for a light beer, but not a particularly great flavor. Strange grassy flavor with a hint of grain and light hop spice and bitternes. Thin watery palate. About as much as one can expect from a light beer.
troyc (2870) - Illinois, USA - DEC 26, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
(Tap) Pours golden with a small white head. More taste and body compared to a macro, but definitely nothing special. Grainy, but nothing offensive. Nice to try, but probably my least favorite Great Dane brew.
jewedekind (450) - Middleton, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 27, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Man these guys have done the impossible by actually reproducing a Miller Lite in a brewpub. Thin, watery with the same chemically thin head. Absolutley no hint of malt or hops. Incredible! Question is ...WHY?
1FastSTi (3344) - Glendale, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 7, 2006
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours to a thin golden body. The flavor is mineral water, lots of sulfides and hints of chlorine. Ever so light Saaz? hops The aroma is lightly Saaz-ish hops. In-offensive and overly unexciting. The palate is medium-light and minerally.
JCapriotti (1379) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 2, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I’ve avoided this a while and it probably should have stayed that way. Pale yellow, very thin creamy head. Tastes like well water. Light corn, grain. Light, but not offensive. Actually, would be a decent beer if you want "a beer" but don’t want anything heavy.
jaymobrown (1741) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - OCT 24, 2005
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Ugh. Golden yellow. Tastes like cereal. Horrid taste. Very odd metallic after taste. This was really not worth trying. It was wet. It didn’t have any hops or anything.
Bockyhorsey (2610) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - OCT 20, 2005
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Sample at pub. Yellow body with white head. Clasic swill and if your on a diet you probly drink this
StewardofGondor (1934) - Washington Heights - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 5, 2005
1.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Looks like water with a dash of yellow food coloring. Big, thin center splotch of white for the head. Pale lager aroma with yeast and lemons leading the way. Taste affirms my suspicions that this is their Miller Lite clone. Crisp, light, yeasty and a hint of lemons. Light, bready, tingly finish.
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - JUN 22, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
I can’t say I enjoyed this one all that much...wouldn’t care to cross paths with it again. Consensus of a straw/barn like flavor...not right.
tomxcs (321) - California, USA - DEC 2, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I sampled a few ounces. Don't wany any more than that. Better than the usual swill that most college kids drink, but still not very good. Weak.