ph0tik (71), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
Sep 17, 2009 I’ve tried a few rice beers and this one seems to be the best so far. You can actually taste that little bit of difference between this and a wheat beer. Finishes smooth and pretty good with any kind of food.
 DWestrick (237), Ft Wayne, Indiana, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Sep 12, 2009 tap - to be honest, i thought it sucked. very bland with 0 interesting characteristics - but thats what you get with a blond ale
arrogantb (700), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Sep 9, 2009 This beer was a strange one. I had a sample of this at the tap room at Great Divide. They also had bottles of it so it should be in stores soon. It was a light yellow in color and cloudy. The taste reminded me of a wheat beer. It did seem like a good beer for a hot day, possibly a barbecue.
Serving type: on-tap
Reviewed on: 06-11-2007 21:20:40
notalush (2647), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Sep 6, 2009 Well, the pour looks okay - hazy gold, sticky lace - light, tangy, lemony aroma, with the rice coming through quite a bit, adding a starchy, cereal quality that works fairly well with the yeast - moderate carbonation, fairly creamy mouthfeel for something so light - despite this, it is crisp and refreshing, with a spicy hop kick on the end - the rice is not as strong as the aroma suggests, and as is not the case with most beers that use it, the rice adds an interesting dimension to what might otherwise be a slightly boring beer - a little bready in the finish, with some toasted grain notes - golden ales get no love.
Tejas (696), Dallas, Texas, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Sep 1, 2009 Fat Pelican > Wilmington, NC. Pretty good but certainly not great. Mildly spicy and more flavor than I expected. One and done though. Not interesting enough to drink again.
cprochak (395), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 5/5 | 13/20 |
Aug 31, 2009 On tap at the brewery on 7/18/09. Pours clear light gold with huge head. Mild banana aroma. Sweet, but thena light crisp rice flavor. Very drinkable with a little dry finish.
sunevdj (1770), Copenhagen OE, Denmark
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Aug 26, 2009 On tap in GD tap room. Pours a hazy yellow with a small white head and a bit of lacings. Moderate sweetness with a light bitterness. Malty with a bit of breadyness. Also a hint of bog myrtle. Medium bodied. Lively carbonation. Dry finish.
demitriustown (693), Shelby Township, Michigan, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Aug 22, 2009 12 oz bottle: Aroma is dry, rice wheat, and somewhat fruity with an almost strawberry scent going on there. Appearance is a cloudy lemonade looking pour with a medium sized fluddy white head that lingers. Taste is rice, fruit like strawberries, and a grainy note. Palate is dry on the tongue and aftertaste has a lingering dry sake like taste to it. Overall, It’s different and intersting to say the least. Worth a try at least once. Cheers!
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)