Suttree (4908) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - NOV 8, 2002
3.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 13/20
Nitro Can. I had this a few years ago and remembered it as rather watery, but tried again recently and found nicely full bodied and flavorful. Probably more of a problem with my palate and memory than the beer. Anyway, full flavored with a rich mellow hoppiness and it looks great in the glass. Good session beer.
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - NOV 4, 2002
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice nitro-look to the pour, but copper-amber body pretty by itself...Unusual aroma that is slightly woody and of ripe (or overripe) fruit---quite rich and unexpected, but strangely appealing...Flavor has a caramelly malt base with fruity tones---hops provide mild bitter presence and balance...Finish has fruity traces and mild hop dryness...Mouthfeel has predictably smooth nitro qualtiy, but fairly good body for a bitter even without the nitrogen boost...I am surprised by how good this is...Much maltier and richer than the majority of bitters; a very nice alternative...
Uglyradio (791) - Greenville, South Carolina, USA - OCT 28, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Nitro Can: Not much aroma, but has a nice typical nitrogen pour with cascading effect and creamy, long lasting head. Nice malty sweet flavor, though it is not very strong. Slightly bitter finish. Head is very long lasting. Not bad for a nitro bitter.
PorterPounder (5205) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - OCT 20, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: AUG 13, 2004 Rerate Revisited this one - still a tasty brew with a lovely pour and aroma, just not worth a 4.0 upon further reflection. Original 4 I'm a sucker for the dramatic pour that the widget produces - so it gets high marks for appearance. Thick, creamy head with a lot of lace, sweet, but not too fruity flavor. Nice strong malty aroma. Good all around bitter.
Allseeingeye (223) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - OCT 19, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Widget can. This one is just OK. Drinkable but watery. Fruity and sweet but not me tup o’ tea.
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - OCT 15, 2002
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Nitro can: a bit fruity and a touch sweet. Less hoppy than Greene King’s Ruddles County ale. You could surely do worse, but the Greene King line comes across to me as being a touch watery and undercarbonated.
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - OCT 7, 2002
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: JUL 19, 2003 Rerate as a draft sampling. Deep rich amber brown, with a thick creamy almond head. My mouth is watering like crazy. Rating is for the second one, because I drank 3/4 of the first pint in one pull. I absolutely love beer like this. Rich full aroma, with a distinctive east kent goldings scent backed with lots of maltiness carrying a pear esteriness. Flavor is fantastic. Medium bodied, nitro carbonation. Lots of maltiness, with all the hops coming through in the finish, balancing some estery fruit flavors. Fairly dry, your tongue begs for more. I'm happy to oblige.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - SEP 15, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
amber/brown, huge foamy head (of course). Body was medium, thicker than expected malts. Had a nice thin hop at the finish, but then all thickness disappeared in that "nitro" thin-ness, as usual. This would be a good session ale.
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 15, 2002
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
mixamatt (427) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 14, 2002
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Winey aroma at first, clear amber red color, slightly bitter. smooth and fairly clean aftertaste.