RateBeer
overall
47
51
style
Brewed by Greene King
Style: Premium Bitter/ESB
Bury St. Edmunds, England
Serve in English pint

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 935   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.07   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
500ml bottles and 440/500ml cans: Filtered. Also available in kegs under nitro pressure.
Ingredients: Pale, Crystal and Amber malts; First Gold, Challenger and Fuggles hops - late-hopped with Fuggles.
First brewed in the 1950s.
Bottles have been sterile filtered since May 2006.


3.7
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
PorterPounder (5355) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - OCT 20, 2002
UPDATED: AUG 13, 2004 Rerate Revisited this one - still a tasty brew with a lovely pour and aroma, just not worth a 4.0 upon further reflection. Original 4 I'm a sucker for the dramatic pour that the widget produces - so it gets high marks for appearance. Thick, creamy head with a lot of lace, sweet, but not too fruity flavor. Nice strong malty aroma. Good all around bitter.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Allseeingeye (223) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - OCT 19, 2002
Widget can. This one is just OK. Drinkable but watery. Fruity and sweet but not me tup o’ tea.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - OCT 15, 2002
Nitro can: a bit fruity and a touch sweet. Less hoppy than Greene King’s Ruddles County ale. You could surely do worse, but the Greene King line comes across to me as being a touch watery and undercarbonated.

4.1
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - OCT 7, 2002
UPDATED: JUL 19, 2003 Rerate as a draft sampling. Deep rich amber brown, with a thick creamy almond head. My mouth is watering like crazy. Rating is for the second one, because I drank 3/4 of the first pint in one pull. I absolutely love beer like this. Rich full aroma, with a distinctive east kent goldings scent backed with lots of maltiness carrying a pear esteriness. Flavor is fantastic. Medium bodied, nitro carbonation. Lots of maltiness, with all the hops coming through in the finish, balancing some estery fruit flavors. Fairly dry, your tongue begs for more. I'm happy to oblige.

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 15/20
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - SEP 15, 2002
amber/brown, huge foamy head (of course). Body was medium, thicker than expected malts. Had a nice thin hop at the finish, but then all thickness disappeared in that "nitro" thin-ness, as usual. This would be a good session ale.

4.1
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 17/20
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 15, 2002

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
mixamatt (427) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 14, 2002
Winey aroma at first, clear amber red color, slightly bitter. smooth and fairly clean aftertaste.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
OlJuntan64 (1265) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - SEP 14, 2002
Mine was bottled (and sans widget) so it probably loses a point on appearance. Anyway, pours a medium amber clear under under a smallish creamy yellow short lasting head. Faint sappy hops and wood cask aroma with some caramel honey aroma as it warms. Medium body with full bitter, and lighter caramel sweet and wood flavoured start and middle. Lighter woody bitter sweet finish and aftertaste.

3.2
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
papajohn (1249) - San Diego (Mira Mesa), California, USA - SEP 2, 2002
Bottle: Deep golden red color. Smooth, creamy sweet malt with a touch of peach flavor. A drinkable brew, but it dosen’t stand out.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
MartinKubert (862) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - AUG 29, 2002
This ale really are a bitter, ’cause it was a bitter experience to drink her! Very thin and harsh. A great disappointment and maybe a reason for me not to drink cask ale again!


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 84 85 86  87  88 89 90 » 94


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50