uhre (384) - DENMARK - OCT 28, 2007
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
The lowest rating ever - poor Asger who brought this beer to a dinner. Felt sorry for the guy, so I had to drink it - good he didn’t see the rating. Anyway the aroma is fruity. The flavor is a bit different, it’s fruity like the aroma, it reminds me of brooklyn lager, but of course not as good! Let’s just say this is the last time I ever taste this beer.
tarjei (1954) - Bryne, NORWAY - OCT 18, 2007
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
750 ml bottle. Has some sweetness ans some bitterness, but all in all much too thin.
MesandSim (7117) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - SEP 3, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A Mes rate:
Bottle from whatever supermarket was doing the "buy this, send us your rate and we will refund your purchase" deal. Bought it, rated it (on here and on the postcard thing that came with the bottle) and it was crap. My rate has obviously been nuked during the change of name. Bollocks. So here it is again. Come on, you’re really interested aren’t you?
kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Name: The Beer to Dine For
clear gold, whispy white head, a unknown species of skunk sprayed into the clear bottle to give it a robust aroma to cover up the sweet malt and floral hops that can be roused upon request, sweet candy flavor with light but tasty (Tettnang) hops, light bitter finish
Aroma: 2/10; Appearance: 4/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 5/20
DJMonarch (9162) - Northwich, Cheshire, ENGLAND - JUL 24, 2007
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
750ml Bottle 04/03/2007
Some carbonation. Hoppy aroma. Clear golden coloured hoppy and slightly spicy. Smooth on the palate. A little dryness in a crisp malt finish.
nick76 (4304) - Tampa, Florida, USA - JUL 13, 2007
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle from my trip through South Carolina. The aroma has some hops but mostly pale malt. The appearance is pale gold with a smaller head. The flavor is like the aroma. The palate is thin. Overall it’s rather unremarkable and not much of a beer by itself.
Palidor19 (3051) - Brandon, Florida, USA - JUL 13, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not quite what I was hoping for. its got a mostly malt presence with very little hop aroma and taste. It taste clean yet has very little character.
OhioDad (2492) - Hilliard, Ohio, USA - JUN 29, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle pours golden with a short white head that stays briefly and leaves a bit of lace. Aromas of slight malts, some grassy hops a bit of skunk. Flavor is grain, a slight bit of citrus and some grass. A fair amount of carbonation gives this a fizzy mouthfeel. Fancy bottle.. Not so fancy of a beer. Kind of crappy actually
lagomswedish (213) - Umeĺ, SWEDEN - MAY 27, 2007
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Comes in a bottle that looks like a butt plug, so my expectations weren’t very high. Pours a glowing golden colour, with faint citrus and flower aromas. Despite the name it delivered a disappointing hop bitterness that was short-lived. Rather thin, and I can’t help feeling GK wimped out a bit on the IBUs with this one. If you’re going to call a beer hops, then make damn sure it tastes of hops!
BeerVirgin72 (880) - Pickerington, Ohio, USA - APR 29, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle under name of The Beer To Dine For. I expected a pretty light tasting beer, and thats exactly what I got. Poured a pale yellow with a quicky disapating white frothy head. Taste was very light malts and some citrus. not much else. Rather boring to me. But I have yet to find an English Ale I enjoy, so It might just be a style I dont care for. Perfectly drinkable on a hot day, we had with pork and it went well, just rather boring to me.