vanvenlo (1652) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - APR 13, 2006
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
14 Mar 2006 - Sweet hopy aroma. Clear amber, low head and poor lacing. Sweet fully hopped and low malt flavour. Bitter hoppy finish, a thin, nothing sort of beer.
saxo (16099) - Højbjerg, Aarhus, DENMARK - MAR 21, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Not much head with shortish duration. Golden colored. Taste is kinda like a lager. Low carbonation.
BBB63 (6509) - La Porte, Indiana, USA - MAR 17, 2006
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
CLEAR Bottle (when will they ever learn?) and cost me $7.50 (when will I ever learn):
Clean golden hue with a small but lasting frothy head but little lace. Smells more like a lager than an ale with the grassy Tettnang hops at the forefront with a dash of biscuity and husky malts. The taste is a straight forward mild bitter and herbal flavor with no depth to speak of. Not that this beer is bad to speak, but for the money it was a poor investment. The best part is the fancy bottle and that is not gonna help the rating, it is not a beer to dine for that is for sure.
AVOID unless you can find it at discount for a buck or two (and by then it most likely will be light struck i.e. skunked!
Lunkie (1732) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - MAR 14, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Hop amlt aroma. Clear yellow colour with poor head and lacing. Spice hop malt flavour. Fizzy palate.
iammadeofjelly (194) - Liverpool, Merseyside, ENGLAND - FEB 26, 2006
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
very lagerish for an ale, theyve gone for american hops so it tastes a bit like a more flavoursome american beer. Certainly no ’beer to dine for’
Mungo (2471) - Southampton, Hampshire, ENGLAND - FEB 8, 2006
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle (from Tescos). Quite neutral overall. Some vaguely fruity grassy hop aromas. Dry with chalky malt flavours. Quite lagerish and seems like an attempt by GK to cash in with a fancy bottle.
Probiere (992) - Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 29, 2006
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Musty, dusty, some floral notes, but they’re dry and stale, a light grainy maltiness, ending on a slightly sweet honeysuckle finish, but the dominant theme is mustiness.
sunevdj (3820) - Copenhagen OE, DENMARK - JAN 23, 2006
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a pale yellow. Looks a lot like boring lager. Very hoppy and high maltiness. Grassy. A bit sticky.
JensenTaster (1719) - DENMARK - JAN 12, 2006
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
(on bottle) Even from half a meters distance is the sour, acidic smell overwhelming. Even the colour is the same as what the aroma makes you hink of; urin. After a few minutes, there are hints of apple and mandarin, eve a few maltgrains It´s gassy, but has a soft mouthfeel and a candyish finish, that actually grows on me. But that sure was a bad start.
Dickinsonbeer (5074) - Hoboken, New Jersey, USA - DEC 20, 2005
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
RLB YEHA 05. Very unique beer in that it is brewed with german hops for an english golden ale. Also held up pretty well despite the clear bottle. Pours very clear and golden with an ok head but fades. Aroma is very herbal and lightly spicy with a slight breadiness in the end from the malt. The noble hops come through again in the flavor- slightly earthy but more of a floral earthy and not woodsy like some other english hops. I really think the tettnang is a good choice for a golden ale- it kinda brings this one closer to a kolsch.