RateBeer
overall
87
94
style
Brewed by St. Jamesís Gate (Diageo)
Style: Dry Stout
Dublin, Ireland

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 4568   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.41   EST. CALORIES: 123   ABV: 4.1%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Available in cans, kegs and bottles with nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Pasteurised. Usually called Draught; sometimes called Cold or Extra Cold - same beer, but served colder.
Launched in 1961.
Ingredients: Pale ale malt, about 25 to 30% flaked barley, and about 10% roasted barley, with no other grains or sugars; several hop varieties, mainly Goldings (pellets and isomerized extract); a flocculent head-forming ale yeast.


4.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 18/20
ucsbdude (68) - Santa Barbara, California, USA - MAY 21, 2002
Just watching this beer being drawn is pure bliss.Dark, rich body with a creamy head.The roasty malt flavor is thick and satisfing.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAY 18, 2002
The pour is one of the mose beautiful things in life. It tears my eye every time. The taste is smooth and silky, a little too much bitter taste on the side of the tounge.

3.5
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 14, 2002
A decent stout, but thereís better. This is thick and satisfying, and is much tastier on draft than in a bottle.

4.1
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
Svartalf99 (4) - USA - MAY 13, 2002 does not count
Ah, Guiness. A good Dry Stout thatís often very available as draft at places that serve real beer. While Iíve heard thereís better, Iíve yet to see/sample it- I wonít argue with the comments, but Iíve just not experienced it yet. Thick, satisfying. Goes GREAT with a lot of meals, esp. something like Shepherdís Pie. If you can get the draft over the cans or bottles, get it.

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
bbooth (115) - Gilbert, Arizona, USA - MAY 13, 2002
Better on draft...everyone knows what this tastes like. I would like to go to Ireland and taste the difference (maybe someday).

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
Jokes (1453) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 13, 2002
I have seen it so many times, but I am still mesmerized when pouring one of these. Perhaps my favorite pour. However, I noticed almost no other distinguishing characteristics. Perhaps this is because it was from the can, but the aroma was non-existent and the flavor was completely gone. The hints of roasted malt were there, but they were only hints. It has such a reputation anymore, I wonder if it can live up to it.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 16/20
scrawfis (143) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - MAY 12, 2002
The unique qualities of Guinness almost deserves a new category of beer. There are definitely stouts with much more flavor and complexity, but the smoothness of Guinness is world class.

3.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
Nuffield (3665) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - MAY 11, 2002
The criticisms of Guinness are not without basis. The legend of the beer exceeds the experience. But the appearance is an everlasting joy, and the texture and taste combine to be like drinking an iced capuccino. Flavor is not as robust as that, and the texture is a bit too watery, but it is enjoyable. Everyone says it is better in Ireland--Iíve had it in Belfast (N.I., of course) and I would say that it is indeed qualitatively different.

4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
Brew4Dug (138) - Houston, Texas, USA - MAY 10, 2002
overall very good. i prefer this over the bottled and canned draught any day.

2.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
MOboy (505) - Kansas City, Missouri, USA - MAY 10, 2002
First time I had this one, I thought I was disgusting! It took me trying a few different stouts for me to really appreciate the work put into this masterpeice. Give it time, youíll grow to love it. Re-rate: Damn, i was pretty new in the beer game when I rated this a 4.2! Definately not very good out of a can. Would much rather have the bottled extra stout (no widget damnit!). This beer is rather wet and thin on the mouth with no real aroma. Nitrogen does shitty things to beer. The only good thing about this version is watching the cascade.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 414 415 416  417  418 419 420 » 457


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50