ucsbdude (68) - Santa Barbara, California, USA - MAY 21, 2002
4.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Just watching this beer being drawn is pure bliss.Dark, rich body with a creamy head.The roasty malt flavor is thick and satisfing.
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAY 18, 2002
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
The pour is one of the mose beautiful things in life. It tears my eye every time. The taste is smooth and silky, a little too much bitter taste on the side of the tounge.
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 14, 2002
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A decent stout, but thereís better. This is thick and satisfying, and is much tastier on draft than in a bottle.
Svartalf99 (4) - USA - MAY 13, 2002 does not count
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Ah, Guiness. A good Dry Stout thatís often very available as draft at places that serve real beer. While Iíve heard thereís better, Iíve yet to see/sample it- I wonít argue with the comments, but Iíve just not experienced it yet.
Thick, satisfying. Goes GREAT with a lot of meals, esp. something like Shepherdís Pie. If you can get the draft over the cans or bottles, get it.
bbooth (115) - Gilbert, Arizona, USA - MAY 13, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Better on draft...everyone knows what this tastes like. I would like to go to Ireland and taste the difference (maybe someday).
Jokes (1453) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 13, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
I have seen it so many times, but I am still mesmerized when pouring one of these. Perhaps my favorite pour. However, I noticed almost no other distinguishing characteristics. Perhaps this is because it was from the can, but the aroma was non-existent and the flavor was completely gone. The hints of roasted malt were there, but they were only hints. It has such a reputation anymore, I wonder if it can live up to it.
scrawfis (143) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - MAY 12, 2002
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
The unique qualities of Guinness almost deserves a new category of beer. There are definitely stouts with much more flavor and complexity, but the smoothness of Guinness is world class.
Nuffield (3665) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - MAY 11, 2002
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
The criticisms of Guinness are not without basis. The legend of the beer exceeds the experience. But the appearance is an everlasting joy, and the texture and taste combine to be like drinking an iced capuccino. Flavor is not as robust as that, and the texture is a bit too watery, but it is enjoyable. Everyone says it is better in Ireland--Iíve had it in Belfast (N.I., of course) and I would say that it is indeed qualitatively different.
Brew4Dug (138) - Houston, Texas, USA - MAY 10, 2002
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
overall very good. i prefer this over the bottled and canned draught any day.
MOboy (505) - Kansas City, Missouri, USA - MAY 10, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
First time I had this one, I thought I was disgusting! It took me trying a few different stouts for me to really appreciate the work put into this masterpeice. Give it time, youíll grow to love it. Re-rate: Damn, i was pretty new in the beer game when I rated this a 4.2! Definately not very good out of a can. Would much rather have the bottled extra stout (no widget damnit!). This beer is rather wet and thin on the mouth with no real aroma. Nitrogen does shitty things to beer. The only good thing about this version is watching the cascade.