foduck (328) - Denton, Texas, USA - FEB 5, 2002
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not enough body. All I can taste is burnt malt and a tiny bit of hops. Iím not really a fan of dry stouts though so I guess I am biased.
keithsbeer99 (3) - Brantford, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 4, 2002 does not count
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
thejman454 (56) - cumming, Georgia, USA - FEB 4, 2002
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Iím not sure if this is beer it is so thick I had to cut it with water, only good in a black and tan
crazydiamond (48) - Michigan, USA - FEB 4, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
For the record, Iím not a real stout fan. But after the first few sips, this beer sort of íbelongsí to you. Part of it I think is keeping the aftertaste away. Hey, I said I wasnít a stout fan!!
BuzzBeer99 (81) - Oklahoma, USA - FEB 4, 2002
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Looks damn good! It isnít... Marketing genius made this beer. Aftertaste is quite harsh and smokey, it leaves you feeling that you need to brush your teeth. Try Murphyís and youíll never drink a guinness again.
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 4, 2002
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Boy, this beer looks good and everyone says it is good, ut tastes more like flat cola than beer, very disapointed after all the hype.
darkvibe (68) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 4, 2002
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Dark, thats the only word for it.
Merc (313) - Pullman, Washington, USA - FEB 1, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I remember the first time I had a Guinness, thinking it was the most incredible thing Iíve ever tasted. Upon revisiting it after trying other stouts, I was dissapointed. Such a pretty boy . . . oh well. Comparatively speaking, watery and simple. Nice smokey taste to it though.
Gregory (357) - Pullman, Washington, USA - FEB 1, 2002
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I was very dissapointed with this beer. I felt it was very flavorless, very thin, and very watery. Now I remember having this beer quite some time ago, and very much enjoyed it, so I wonder what has changed, and perhaps this was a bad tap, I donít know, but my for what I tasted tonight, no way it was worth $5 for a pint.
bluemeow76 (693) - Lewis Center, Ohio, USA - FEB 1, 2002
4.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
I was surprised by the taste. Very rich and creamy.