Brew4Dug (138) - Houston, Texas, USA - MAY 10, 2002
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
overall very good. i prefer this over the bottled and canned draught any day.
MOboy (505) - Kansas City, Missouri, USA - MAY 10, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
First time I had this one, I thought I was disgusting! It took me trying a few different stouts for me to really appreciate the work put into this masterpeice. Give it time, youíll grow to love it. Re-rate: Damn, i was pretty new in the beer game when I rated this a 4.2! Definately not very good out of a can. Would much rather have the bottled extra stout (no widget damnit!). This beer is rather wet and thin on the mouth with no real aroma. Nitrogen does shitty things to beer. The only good thing about this version is watching the cascade.
bierkoning (9999) - La Tropica, NETHERLANDS - MAY 5, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: NOV 23, 2004 Typical creamy lasting head. Aroma of roasted malt, chocolate and coffee. Very bitter. Little bit of apple fruitiness and milk well hidden behind the typical dry stout taste.
Guinness is best fresh from tap in Dublin, but this can is not a bad substitute. 8 4 7 3 14 =3.6
Tap: Finneganís in Hengelo. As it should be: bitter, roasted malt, smooth and creamy. Thin and even a bit watery, in spite of the creaminess. Still a great session beer.
jbak (111) - Torrington, Connecticut, USA - MAY 5, 2002
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
The only way to make Guinness better was to make it more portable, no glasses needed here and they did an awesome job!!!!
DarkFudge99 (5) - Dumont (Irish Headquarters USA), New Jersey, USA - MAY 5, 2002 does not count
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Not my choice for a stout....Itís a bit watery and the feeling I am left with when drinking this beer is the impression of drinking wet slightly bitter but smooth baseball glove leather.....not bad but thatís the closest description of what this tastes like out of the can...its ok
Cruddler (32) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAY 4, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
My first exposure to Guiness. Good looks tend to inflate the score.
JoeM500 (1902) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - MAY 2, 2002
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: NOV 13, 2003 Re-rated once I got out and had more stouts and learned more about beer in general. I still enjoy it, and will often have a 'guinness only' night at my favorite Irish Pub. The cascade is the coolest thing to watch, and the flavor still satisfies me, but I over-rated it in my early stages of rating!
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - MAY 2, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: APR 15, 2003 Yeah, whatever.
phersjm99 (25) - Savage, Minnesota, USA - MAY 1, 2002
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
Rib Eye (147) - USA - MAY 1, 2002
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAR 18, 2003 Everyone knows Guinness, so I post this simply for point of reference. Not at all complex, Guinness is a bitter watery tar with nice mouthfeel. It's too one note and way too filling to be my everyday beer though. Bitter without being hoppy and malty without being sweet. In other words flavorful without having much taste.