suprchunk (1803) - Crestview, Florida, USA - OCT 25, 2011
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Brown/red colored pour. Big white head. Of course it was nitroíd. A slight roasty aroma. Not much taste. Like a diluted real beer. Wonít be pursuing this one again.
Imaena (1630) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - FEB 10, 2013
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Draught. I got a pint of this when I was out with Drew in Evesham. Canít recall which pub. Dreadful stuff really.
Doppelganger (1387) - Dry County, Arkansas, USA - FEB 20, 2008
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Nitro, Turf Tavern, Oxford RB Crawl. Perfect (in the sense that plastic roses are perfect) nitro head on tarnished copper pour. No aroma registers. Very light husky astringency to the flavor. Clean, but thatís about all that can be said for it.
wheresthepath (1385) - Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - MAY 16, 2008
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
[on tap in OíNeillís, Reading] Unusually amongst the global brands, Guinnessí main product (which presumably will now be rebranded as "Guinness Black") is unique and rather special. I was therefore looking forward to tasting the new Guinness Red, despite my friends telling me to avoid it.
Guinness Red, according to the friendly and surprisingly knowledgeable barman in OíNeills, has been created by roasting the barley more lightly than in the "Black". It pours an impressively deep ruby red, still with the signature thick, creamy Guinness head with a shamrock etched into it. Itís certainly designed with attractive appearance in mind.
Unfortunately the brewery seems to have spent so much time making it look right that they have neglected the taste. I was quite shocked by the lack of any flavour at all in my first mouthful. It was smooth and creamy, yet weak and watery. It went down exceptionally easily as a result - I could easily sink several pints without it touching the sides! Drinking more of it did reveal tantalising glimpses of Guinness Black flavour if you really concentrated, and I picked up the slightest hint of maltiness. These are truly subtle flavours though!
I was wondering what the point of this beer was, until a beer-hating friend of mine tasted it and said with some surprise "actually, this is alright. I could drink this". So there it is, this is a beer targetted at non-beer drinkers, which is a bit odd as theyíre unlikely to try it in the first place. I canít actually see this product surviving, as Guinness drinkers will still go for the black, whilst non-Guinness drinkers wonít buy it at all. Overall I was left feeling I hadnít had a beer at all (there is also very little aftertaste), and wishing Iíd heeded my friendsí advice.
dynamiteninja (1290) - Richmond, North Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 25, 2011
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Keg draught, The Dry Dock, Leicester. Watered down Guinness. Appearance is just like regular Guinness although slightly lighter, with more red hue showing through. Watery bitterness. Okay, but Iíd prefer a regular Guinness.
kwik-lime (1052) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - OCT 2, 2009
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bland and watery, just a paled down version of Guinness with a think and watery palate. Pointless.
reakt (949) - Greater London, ENGLAND - MAR 18, 2007
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: SEP 24, 2007 Draught from Oí Neillís. Dark amber/mahogany in colour topped with the trademark off white foam. Nose of roasted malt with a taste to match. Slightly sweet with underlying bitter hop and barley notes that shine through. Baking chocolate comes to mind. More watery than expected but enough creamy Guinness character to just about pull it off. I had two pints from the same pump only poured by two different people. The first was actually quite nice but the second, as mentioned by most, was tasteless and I think the glass was a bit grimey by the way the bubbles clung to it. Anyway, still a nice twist on a classic.
Osprey87 (917) - London via, WALES - MAR 18, 2013
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Memories of St Patrickís days past. This beer isnít the best aspect of those memories though - a watery and sickly, inferior version of the Guinness we all know and love.
jbuzz (733) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 15, 2007
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This one looks better than it tastes. I like Reds but this one misses for me. Not as dark as the original Guinness. But not as red or flavorful as I felt it should be.
gracefullypunk (667) - Oregon, USA - MAR 12, 2010
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Unimpressive. No idea why anyone would drink this over ordinary Guinness, especially in a place where you can get the real thing (not the Budweiser version). Itís watery and nearly tasteless.