maneliquor (2222) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - JUL 23, 2011
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
It’s definitely dry. Not much else. Boring but surprisingly not as bad as you would think
michclark (88) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 28, 2011
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
very popular beer at the moment. Pretty good aroma and appearance. Nice dry finish with over all nice amount of flavour.
Stew41 (1624) - Woodend, AUSTRALIA - MAR 27, 2011
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Hey this is not that bad! Very quaffable and yes dry in the Asahi definition of dry. Some dumb industrial sweetness is not offensive and to be honest I can see the appeal of this beer. It would be easy to suck down plenty of this (I imagine). Plus I’m not getting fat.
ndon (857) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - JUN 28, 2010
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
the only positive about this beer is.... nope, drawn a blank. same standard ’low carb’ as every other one on the market.
Blockley (102) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - APR 12, 2010
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Tap @ bar
Rubbish. This ’beer’ tastes like it was fermented in an old boot. Good thing I didn’t pay for this disaster. But I digress. This nasty brew pours your typical pale straw colour with a laughably weak, white head. The aroma is cheap and artificial. There is no flavour too this beer, and it certainly isn’t ’dry’ either. It is watery and offensive. The finish was equally appalling and lingers far too long.
Another example of generic macro filth tailored to people who don’t have a clue. This is one of the worst excuses for beer I have tried, and will never dare to try it again.
Davros (1720) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - FEB 24, 2010
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours pale gold with a large head that quickly fades into a scum-like layer.
Nose shows loads of sweet vegetal and rice notes, with some faint spicy hops in the background, followed later by some clean malt.
Very little in the way of flavours, there’s some cardboardy cereal malt before a short-lived bitterness kicks in.
Carbonation is too high.
floydian1 (799) - FNQ, Australia, - JAN 4, 2010
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Draught. A clear straw yellow beer with a negligible white head. Faint malty aromas and little else. Watery flavours of sweet malts, metals and chemicals with a very faint hop bitterness. Light-medium bodied. Pretty awful.
BarossaLuke (529) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 22, 2009
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Cold, wet and thirst quenching. but then again so is water... Thin light bodied beer that is designed to be an Asahi rip off for the lowest common denominator. One schooner is more than enough.
NoiZe (2324) - Amersfoort, NETHERLANDS - JUN 28, 2009
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Had this one during my holiday in Australia april/may 2009. Very weak, dull brew.
alepig666 (78) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JUN 9, 2009
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 5/20
A pub that I go to often for live music purposes has this appaling selection of tap beers: Tooheys New, Tooheys Extra Dry, Heineken, Southwark Pale and Hahn Super Dry. Heineken is overpriced and usuallythe tap is dodgy, so I always end up drinking the Super Dry at $3.50 a pint. Lacks flavour, but it’s weak rather then watery. Tailor made to get you drunk, so if that’s what your seeking go for it, otherwise shell out a bit more for something better. Nothing remotely offensive about it, but nothing impressive either. Meh.