Wrath (362) - Valparaiso, Indiana, USA - MAY 9, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
For the price a pretty good beer. A little more body and taste thanthe regular. A little sweetness is noticed. Good very cold on a hot day.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - APR 12, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I can't say this is there best rendition of beer not as good as the regular and as i can see by the other rating's,I'm on the same page as everyone else.Nice golden color,slight head,weak flavor of water and small hop taste nothing special but will do the trick on a hot summer day.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JAN 22, 2003
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not bad for an American standard...but definitely does not taste like it came from the land of clear blue waters.
Crit (3369) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 27, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
corny and grainy nose and palate
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - SEP 22, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
A bit more body and balance than regular Hamm’s, but one can taste the adjunct sweetness more at the same time. In short, drinkable but certainly nothing that would give reason to rush to the market.
BeermanLayton (33) - Rohnert Park, California, USA - SEP 12, 2002
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Regular is better.
npdempse (934) - St. Petersburg, Florida, USA - AUG 29, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Yeesh. Corn flavored. Now, if they got it to taste like ham, now that would be something.
Beer Guy99 (250) - Maineville, Ohio, USA - AUG 10, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Ahhh, Hamm’s. I have to say I’m rating the version brewed by Pabst a couple of years ago. I haven’t had it since Miller took over stewardship of the brand. I can only hope they’re not putting Milwaukee’s Best in Hamm’s cans. Under Pabst it was still a very drinkable beer. When Hamm’s made it and then Olympia, it was a damn good beer, easily besting any of the more popular national brands...and one of the early draft beers in a can. Clean, refreshing and always consistent. I have a nostalgic bone for Hamm’s Draft - the beer refreshing!
rkn65 (106) - st. clair shores, Michigan, USA - AUG 7, 2002
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
goes down nice , taste is light but not overcarbonated.
duece (103) - Waterford, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 25, 2002
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Strong alcohol aroma, but nice color. Taste is simple enough for the style with no unpleasant aftertaste. Definitely not a great beer but exceptional for the price.