spikester (604) - Salem, Oregon, USA - MAR 28, 2009
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Gold color with a white fluffy head. Aroma is slightly metallic and corny. Taste is a bit deeper than regular Hamms and maybe a touch sweeter. Good fishing beer when served ice cold from the can.
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - SEP 22, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
A bit more body and balance than regular Hamm’s, but one can taste the adjunct sweetness more at the same time. In short, drinkable but certainly nothing that would give reason to rush to the market.
Wrath (362) - Valparaiso, Indiana, USA - MAY 9, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
For the price a pretty good beer. A little more body and taste thanthe regular. A little sweetness is noticed. Good very cold on a hot day.
Mrthirstyneck (341) - Minnesota, USA - AUG 19, 2006
3.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
oh come on its hamms for gods sakes just tasty tymes really for all to enjoy
brewshthereen (316) - Oregon, USA - JUN 16, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Smooth tasting, and rather creamy mouthfeel. There is actually some flavor to this one. Slightly harsh at the finish but at least you know it has some life to it. Not the best of the bunch, but far from the worst.
bipolar1 (268) - Hancock, Michigan, USA - SEP 16, 2001
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: MAR 30, 2005 Who hasn’t stood around a nice raging fire on a cool fall evening and knocked back a few ice cold Hamm’s? This stuff is legendary, and is the perfect compliment to some fresh Wisconsin brats and sweet corn on the grill.
dankman (254) - Somewhere in, Ohio, USA - AUG 17, 2007
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is a cheap beer that drinks better than anything else in its price range (one step up from malt liquor) and deserves some respect!!! O.K. it may not deserve respect but it beats Bud and Miller.
Beer Guy99 (250) - Maineville, Ohio, USA - AUG 10, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Ahhh, Hamm’s. I have to say I’m rating the version brewed by Pabst a couple of years ago. I haven’t had it since Miller took over stewardship of the brand. I can only hope they’re not putting Milwaukee’s Best in Hamm’s cans. Under Pabst it was still a very drinkable beer. When Hamm’s made it and then Olympia, it was a damn good beer, easily besting any of the more popular national brands...and one of the early draft beers in a can. Clean, refreshing and always consistent. I have a nostalgic bone for Hamm’s Draft - the beer refreshing!
GrainBeltGuzzler (249) - Goodhue, Minnesota, USA - JUL 9, 2004
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
not a beer that can be recommended, very smooth watery beer. Strong corn overtones. No real malt or hops presence. fairly similar to regular hamms in quality. Definately Bear piss
blackmurder (226) - sadf, Hawaii, USA - JUN 18, 2010
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
I’m a long time fan of good, balanced cheap lagers. This one takes the cake. I got this from my fiance. She had a chest of random, old beers and being the Hamms fan I am I decided to pick this one up. It’s very flavorful for a cheap lager. Crisp and refreshing...if I could find this more often you have my word that I would buy a case of it almost every week. By far the best macro lager I have ever had.