Beer Guy99 (251) - Maineville, Ohio, USA - AUG 10, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Ahhh, Hammís. I have to say Iím rating the version brewed by Pabst a couple of years ago. I havenít had it since Miller took over stewardship of the brand. I can only hope theyíre not putting Milwaukeeís Best in Hammís cans. Under Pabst it was still a very drinkable beer. When Hammís made it and then Olympia, it was a damn good beer, easily besting any of the more popular national brands...and one of the early draft beers in a can. Clean, refreshing and always consistent. I have a nostalgic bone for Hammís Draft - the beer refreshing!
Puss Gutt99 (206) - Oldtown, Florida, USA - JAN 26, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
not bad at a great price
bjl8691 (60) - racine, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 25, 2007
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 6/20
i like this better than regualr hamms its getting harder to find i found it at a pick n save in shorewood,wi
adsti3 (29) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 15, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I liked this one fine, not as much as the original Hammís but itís the best genuine draft there is.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - APR 12, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I can't say this is there best rendition of beer not as good as the regular and as i can see by the other rating's,I'm on the same page as everyone else.Nice golden color,slight head,weak flavor of water and small hop taste nothing special but will do the trick on a hot summer day.
Reid (2300) - Salem, Oregon, USA - NOV 12, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bought in the 12 oz can...Nice simple black,red and gold design.
Not a bad looking macro lager, clear,bright golden yellow with a nice sized frothy white head..that doesnt last too long.Some carbonation visible.
Nice "clean" aroma..mostly of malts but some hop detetcted.
Taste is actually not too bad for a macro..malty sweetness up front followed by a sort of bitter astringency ( though its not unpleasant)..that may be the hops.
Sort of watery in the mouth..has a dry finish.
I was pleasantly surprised by this cheap beer..hell it is not what I would call a good beer..but its a perfectly acceptable American macro.
pkbites (862) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 12, 2014
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I used to hate regular Hamms but my father-in-law would leave some in the fridge for himself and Iíd drink it just to spite him. Developed a taste for it. This is more metallic tasting than the regular version, so itís not as good. But itís not horrible either. Malty, hoppy, and inexpensive for what it is.
drunkenbum84 (73) - kenosha, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 1, 2007
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
My favorite of the 3 varieties of hamms. Pours a golden color with a corn and malt flavor. Its one of the better ultra cheap beers out there.
duece (103) - Waterford, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 25, 2002
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Strong alcohol aroma, but nice color. Taste is simple enough for the style with no unpleasant aftertaste. Definitely not a great beer but exceptional for the price.
beerbill (3605) - Laurel, New York, USA - JAN 22, 2007
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12 oz. can. Pours a deeper gold than the typical american lager with a moderate white head. Aromas of caramel, corn, and malt. Same qualities in the flavor. Really not a bad brew.