crossovert (11344) - Illinois, USA - MAR 24, 2011
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
One of the better light beers, but still incredibly poor. IT is light, golden, fizzy, not good.
shrubber85 (10660) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - MAY 14, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can. Slightly sour, stale corn/barley malt aroma. Pale yellow color with small head. Light slightly sweet barley malt flavor. Palate mainly water - just a hint of malt in the finish. On the positive side, no bad flavors. On the negative side, very little flavor at all. Almost worth the $2.95 I paid for the sixer.
slowrunner77 (10077) - Reno, Nevada, USA - SEP 24, 2016
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
old review - a little less offensive than regular Hamms, so a little more palatable. Has that classic swill stank though that non beer drinkers think of when they think of "beer"
Ughsmash (7508) - Pewaukee, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 29, 2015
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Canned. Poured clear, bright golden with a sticky white head. The aroma picked up light bready malts and light dusty notes.. just a hair metallic. The flavor found similar, picking up hints of corn.. not a lot to it. Light-bodied with moderate-plus carbonation.. OK flow.
Patrickctenchi (6014) - Coxís Knob, columbus, Indiana, USA - JUN 6, 2012
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can to English Pint.
Pours astonishingly clear, pale gold...
Foamy white head.
Scent is cardboard box,wet corn.
Taste is similar....more water, more weak grain.
Iíd pick the regular Hammís anytime.
They didnít put the Hammís Bear on the can.....not because today itís a politically/socially unacceptable marketing ploy......itís because he would be sad.
Skyview (5696) - Papoose Jct, Minnesota, USA - APR 5, 2007
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Hammís Light? I thought regular Hammís was light enough. It pours a clear yellow, slightly white head with a lot of carbonation. Head is absent even at 40 degrees. Watery grainy and grassy aroma. Hardly any taste. Maybe some cereal grain and metalic metal. I good lawn mower beer at 35 degrees.
cheap (5305) - Beaver Valley, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 3, 2012
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Looks as good as ony other clean pale lager. Smell is a little off but not bad. Taste has a little cardboard in ther but never approaches the cardboard of coors beers. Donít think this is as good os the hamms I rated yesterday. Cannot really find anything bad about this fairly mild lager beer. Has a tad of that pocessed feel to it. Yep, not bad overall. I think that regular hamms is even lighter & smoother and more behaved than this. 25 cents for a 12 oz can in a case of thirty at my local distributor.
heemer77 (5294) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - JAN 6, 2006
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Light yellow colored body with a white head. The aroma is corny with some vomit and honey, The taste has light corn and cheap tobacco. There is also some light note of wood. An ok light lager.
oldrtybastrd (5003) - Fort Walton Beach, Florida, USA - DEC 28, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours a golden yellow color. Aromas of corn, grains, and a touch of hops. Flavor is crisp.
badgerben (4864) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - MAY 1, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
To say this was a light yellow color would be a vast understatement. Pretty thick head. Aroma was slightly skunky grains. The taste was mellow to say the least. Very subdued silo flavor. Muddled corn and barley. There are certainly more swillish beers than this, but itís not great.