decaturstevo (5342) - decatur, Tennessee, USA - MAY 15, 2013
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pale yellow pour with white head. Aroma is wet paper and light sour malt. Flavor is very light malt and wet paper. Light bodied/watery. Ok beer for this bland style
rondphoto (2615) - Lakeside Park, Kentucky, USA - APR 22, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Clear light golden amber with a rim head and thin streaks of lace. What a disappointment! Corn and malt with carbonation, which, even though it has a little flavor, comes across as bland and bloating. The label suggests a better brew than is delivered. Not recommended.
fluffy (1893) - St Petersburg, Florida, USA - MAR 20, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
why even make a lager if you arent going to make it unique? too many bland lagers out there to deal with this too.
AndyW68 (1194) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - MAR 18, 2013
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 6/20
Yellow with white head. Musty grass aroma. Taste is the same. Not one of my beers.
TheBeerOrg (2145) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - JAN 23, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours light golden with a thin fully receding off-white head. Notes of bready lager yeast, pils malt, metallic yeast, husky. Thin bodied with lively carbonation.
deyholla (7588) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - SEP 18, 2012
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Pours a clear pale gold with a fizzy white head that dissipates quickly to the edges. Aroma has a note of sweet stale corn as well as musty bread and no hop character. Flavor was similar with a stale corn note and musty sweet bread. Thin.
tnkw01 (1279) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - AUG 23, 2012
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Not very good. Gold color, with some head. Taste like any other American made lager, not very original. Aroma, also not very original. Definitely not the Jack Daniels of beers.
coolpop (1394) - Birmingham, Alabama, USA - JUL 27, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Pours pale gold with a very small white head. No lacing. Aroma is toasted malt, grain, grassy hops. Flavor is grain and grass. Slightly maltier macro lager with a cool label and fashionable tie-in.
seymour (1591) - Maplewood, Missouri, USA - JUL 27, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tasted from 11.2oz bottle into a nonic pint glass. It poured a boring clear straw color with short-lived white foam. Aromas and flavors typical of crappy adjunct lager. Harsh, bad. This was a very obvious marketing tie-in with Jack Daniels whiskey. I really can’t understand why they would want to cheapen their image this way. Guh!
gregwilsonstl (1253) - Missouri, USA - JUL 26, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clear yellow. Fizzy. Tastes like fermented corn....tastes very cheap. This is awful.