RateBeer
overall
21
96
style
Brewed by St. Jamesís Gate (Diageo)
Style: Pale Lager
Dublin, Ireland

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1817   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.77/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bright pale golden; fruity nose; crisp and clean, slightly bitter up front, smooth aftertaste.


2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
parkhead99 (41) - IRELAND - FEB 22, 2002
Quite nice but leaves you with a terrible hangover

2.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - FEB 22, 2002
UPDATED: NOV 11, 2003 I recall this being better before it was made in Canada. Maybe it's just my imagination. RERATE 11/12/03: Weak nose, with a bit of malt, golden body, smallish head receding quickly. Hmmm, this is actually pretty drinkable, with a medium-sweet fruity body, a hint of the hop, and a fruity finish. What happened? I haven't had this beer in two years, and back then it was nasty and metallic, with a harsh, grainy body. This is actually pretty decent today. A little too sweet for the style, but certainly drinkable.

2.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 8/20
quiksilverxtc99 (99) - USA - FEB 20, 2002
Very disappointing beer from a supposedly world renound brewer. Terrible aftertaste and not very smooth or satisfying. If youíre going to spend this much, get a Bass.

3.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Fulkrum78 (175) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - FEB 19, 2002
I love Harp. Great beer. But then, Iím Irish.

3.2
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Blatz King (150) - Whitewater, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 19, 2002
I had it in a bottle. It smelled good but i donít think i could drink more than 3 at a time. Weird taste.

2.4
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
GiddyBoy (121) - USA - FEB 17, 2002
(draft) Puke. I canít believe Guiness brews this. It had bite, but was completely unsatisfying

4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
jagerphish99 (33) - USA - FEB 17, 2002

3.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
shadey (2073) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - FEB 16, 2002
A pleasure to drink.

3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - FEB 13, 2002
I was somewhat disappointed by the flavor of this one. With all of the hype surrounding it I expected something more.

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 13, 2002
Very nice quality lager, nice carbonation and very smooth, consistant flavor. I would recomend trying some.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 166 167 168  169  170 171 172 » 182


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50