DrnkMcDermott (2879) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - AUG 26, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
330 ml bottle. Yeah, like Iíd save this in the event I ever reach 5000 ratings. Pours at least with a burnished gold lager color, but no head. Smells syrupy and pretty old. Taste is pretty much the same way. What alcohol is there is kind of harsh. Not much else here to recommend it. Does come in a nice thick bottle for mailing to homebrew competitions.
scraff (2121) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - AUG 11, 2006
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Off the bat - this still beats the crap out of any AB product. Clear sparkling gold, thin fizzy white head. Nose was full of honeyed grassy hops, light pepper, and hints of corn. Flavor was one in the same with a decent peppery hop tone to balance the sweetness. Borders malt liquor, but no matter. Medium bodied, prickly carbonation, clean, honey pepper finish. Goes well with my curry chicken...that I am only thiniking about right now....
GreenDragon (219) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 19, 2006
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours a pale yellow with a thick strong head. Grassy aroma with the typical larger scent. Strong but tasteless. Thin, metallic body.
highlandlad (1434) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - JUN 15, 2006
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Dire Indian strong lager. The marketing spiel on the bottle wanks on about "timeless Indian brewing traditions". My arse - this is brewed by Skol for SABMiller, so any ítraditionsí are imported. This was barely better than a malt liquor. This will sell well in Indian restaurants around the world - there were two tables of England football fans near us and they sank a few before going to watch their teamís World Cup tie with Paraguay. (If Iíd known how turgid the match would be, I would have had a few more...) But it doesnít complement the food that well - itís too strong in alcohol and thick in the body to be quenching. Youíre better off with Kingfisher if you must. Itís pale yellow and raised a thin film of foam. The aroma is dominated by alcohol, with some corn and faint lemon juice. The mouthfeel is hard and the finish is metallic and nasty. (330ml bottle at Nirankar Indian restaurant, Melbourne)
rpattinson (84) - Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS - JUN 1, 2006
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pale yellow, disappearing head; dust, pepper and pissa roma; sweet taste with a funny hop aroma; vaguely bitter, lightly peppery finish. Not the best Iíve had, but not the worst by any means
Nejhleader (1306) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 25, 2006
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
with a name like haywards 5000 I had to try it. aroma has a hint of corn a tad sweet, not much taste, a bit sweet, If this is Indias version of bud or coors then they should consider themselves lucky. For a 7% pale lager it is not bad.
madquacker (1069) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - FEB 5, 2006
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
No balance whatsoever. Corn syrup followed by a foul alcholic flatness. Like mytho. Reminds me of the rocket fuel of my youth. Truely dire.
JahNoth (1039) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 4, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Fairly sweet lager with a crisp flavor. Dark golden in color with simple head. Nice balance and refreshing.
frankenkitty (1971) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - JAN 28, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden with some effervescent streams, but no head save a white, scummy film. A few dashes of peppery particulate. If any beer could truly rate a "1" in appearance here we have it. Aromas were interesting to say the least, but pretty darn awful: PlayDoh & grass with charcoal and exhaust. After I finished cussing out Cornfield for providing me this gem, I took a sip. Not too horrendous with some floral sweetness, but the finish was industrial with corn-syrupy and notes of fuel. There were times that I detected plastic or leather (my wife asked, "Pleather?" and Iíll go with that). Aftertaste was of Blue Chlorasepticģ. When I try a new beer I expected my senses to be entertained, but this, THIS was a culinary Grand Guignol.
<font size=-4>Single bottle from <a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/ViewUser.asp?UserID=1 cellar.<font size=-1>
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - DEC 31, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottled, Delhi, India. Golden larger that struggled to form and hold a head. Sweat malty aroma. The flavour has body and the first in some time to do so. This isnít the worst beer on the planet but donít travel to Delhi to get it. Short on the palate itís not rewarding but doesnít offend either.