caesar (5766) - Bunnik/Utrecht, NETHERLANDS - SEP 18, 2003
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bitter english style beer, but this one is quite well balanced compared to some of the extremely bitter beers like Fullers 1846.
wnp22 (685) - Toronto (Roncesvalles Village), Ontario, CANADA - SEP 16, 2003
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Tasted in Toronto from LCBO. Aroma is flowery with a honey aroma. Hints of
lavender and clove / spice. Appearance is amber / copper in colour, small white
head. Flavour is sweet, with a honey-like taste. No hoppy bitterness (after all
it is made with Heather as opposed to hops). Malt richness comes out well with
the heather background.
skortila (4820) - Baarn, NETHERLANDS - SEP 9, 2003
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I was pretty amazed by this one. For some reason my expectations weren't too high. However the aroma was quite good; sweet, peach, some malts. Appearance was okay, poors out with a nice head (doesn't last) orange/amber coloured. Cloudy. Taste is hoppy, peachy and some smooth malts. Bit watery. Clean, smooth, dry palate. Quite okay.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - AUG 28, 2003
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Poured a nice hazy gold. Nice sweet aroma and a sweet, honied taste. Interesting ale ... and good.
BBB63 (6426) - La Porte, Indiana, USA - AUG 24, 2003
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Hazy golden hue with an okay head and good lacing. Floral aroma of hay fields, herbs, lemongrass, elderberry, grapes, and earthy yeast. Unique tastes of pineapple, herbs, aromatic hops and earthy heather and hay. Some sweet white wine qualities. Dry and clean finish. Thin to medium-bodied with a crewy and soft mouthfeel. Different for sure! For a slighty heavy ale it is quite refreshing. I'll have to get more of this.
badgerben (4596) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - AUG 22, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: JUN 8, 2004 The Grog & Gruel, Fort William, Scotland. Amberish color. Smells sweet, and tastes sweeter, but not overpoweringly so. Certainly reminiscent of heather fields. (June 8, 2004 Addition): Now that I've had this again... its taste is much more up front this time. I noticed the wonderful spices right up front; it really added a lot. The color was a beautiful dark yellow. I enjoyed it much more the second time around. Not sure if that's a bottle vs tap issue or just being better adjusted to beer.
NectarFarm (128) - Calgary, CANADA - AUG 16, 2003
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
pours amber. small white ead that dies fast. little bit of lace. smells sweet and a bit spicy. tastes like tea and honey and is more than that the aroma let on. pretty good though.
Nuffield (3805) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - JUL 27, 2003
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Lightish amber color, little head, slightly syrupy appearance. Aroma suggests that I've walked into a National Trust giftshop, floral and perfumy. Flavor and not especially interesting palate, even watery. Slightly hazy. Not as bad as the sum of its parts. (gravity pour at 2003 Kent Beer Festival)
BierBauch (784) - Cape Coral Waterfront Wonderland, Florida, USA - JUL 15, 2003
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Deep golden with low retention.Nice big floral/hop aroma.Babysbreath? Flavor is sweet and floral with good hops and sweet malts. A most interesting flavor. Earthy, woodsy and sweet. Body is a bit light but interesting blends make up for that shortcoming. Not one I'd drink often but I'd love to try it on draught.
ericnixon (741) - Portland, Oregon, USA - JUL 10, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Very thin white head...golden-orangy color with lots of little things floating in it (sea monkeys?). The aroma really reminded me of the Berkshire Botanical Gardens with all that flowery stuff going on. the taste...is different. it really tastes like it's lacking something, but in a floral kinda way. kinda like really crappy-as cider with no bite. there's a slight fizziness to it when you first taste it, but it's gone a half-second later. it's interesting in a historical way (kinda sorta), and it's ok and definately drinkable, but i can't get over the fact that it needs something (hops!). i wonder if Fraoch means "we have three of four ingredients for beer, so what the hell, let's make a batch and see how it turns out!"