billtheman (79) - milford, Delaware, USA - MAY 31, 2008
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Better version of Old Style then regular od Old Style. A mass produced, which is better by far then Budwieser, or for that matter and Anhauser-Bushe beer.
Has a nonoffensive aroma and appearance. Flavor is ok for a mass produce. Pleasent enough on the palate, considering mass production.
I only wish the Good Old US of A would make better mass beers.
TheGuy (653) - Illinois, USA - FEB 23, 2008
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JUN 29, 2009 a little better than just plain old style but still just a crap american macro force feed how can i make money beer
bjl8691 (60) - racine, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 25, 2007
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 9/20
best thing with the old style name pretty cheap price not a horrible taste i think it only comes is 30 pack cans
lovemyipas (544) - nw burbs, Illinois, USA - OCT 12, 2006
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: FEB 14, 2007 great cheap beer probably the best cheapy. meadium head that does not last long, does not have to much taste to it pretty much like water definetly a slamming cheap beer with hardly any hang over.
konair1 (66) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - APR 11, 2006
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAY 11, 2006 The color is golden. It was a little too bitter. Better than Bud and Miller, but overall an average beer.
Capa (2573) - Kitsap, Washington, USA - MAR 6, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden in color with a pillowy head that diminished about half way through. Very light malt aroma with a little sweetness as well. Flavor was generic. Malt and sweet with a little bitterness to round it out. Better than a Miller, but still not all that great. Cheap though...
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - AUG 1, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was nothing special with a light malt side some sweetness and just a hint of hops.The flavor came off as being a light malt and some hops with a cereal like quality coming through as well.sort of on the sweet side,but over all nothing special for a brew.it’s worth a try but little more then that.
JPDIPSO (5450) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 3, 2004
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Straw color with a initially fluffy white head that dissipates to a small lid and a spattering of lace. Initial rubber nose, that mellows to a lightly malty and grassy aroma. Initial simple sweetness, near corn syrup. Middle has more of a grainy sweetness and a touch of depth and bitterness. Near malt finish, but also seems more watery. A dry chalky bump does some damage right at the end. A decent thickness for style. Still not much.
Frank (3901) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 23, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Hardly any different from regular Old Style. Perhaps a bit hoppier and slightly more carbonated. Pretty good.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JUL 10, 2003
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Ouch, this one will hurt you the next day. It has some nice characteristics to it, but do not let that fool you. Somewhat full - bodied with that bite to it in the aftertaste, anyone that has had this knows what I am talking about. Don't knock it...it's cheap