JPDIPSO (4956) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 3, 2004
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Straw color with a initially fluffy white head that dissipates to a small lid and a spattering of lace. Initial rubber nose, that mellows to a lightly malty and grassy aroma. Initial simple sweetness, near corn syrup. Middle has more of a grainy sweetness and a touch of depth and bitterness. Near malt finish, but also seems more watery. A dry chalky bump does some damage right at the end. A decent thickness for style. Still not much.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JUL 10, 2003
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Ouch, this one will hurt you the next day. It has some nice characteristics to it, but do not let that fool you. Somewhat full - bodied with that bite to it in the aftertaste, anyone that has had this knows what I am talking about. Don't knock it...it's cheap
Frank (2302) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 23, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Hardly any different from regular Old Style. Perhaps a bit hoppier and slightly more carbonated. Pretty good.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - AUG 1, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was nothing special with a light malt side some sweetness and just a hint of hops.The flavor came off as being a light malt and some hops with a cereal like quality coming through as well.sort of on the sweet side,but over all nothing special for a brew.it’s worth a try but little more then that.
Capa (1942) - Manama, BAHRAIN - MAR 6, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden in color with a pillowy head that diminished about half way through. Very light malt aroma with a little sweetness as well. Flavor was generic. Malt and sweet with a little bitterness to round it out. Better than a Miller, but still not all that great. Cheap though...
21iceman40 (1731) - vienna, West Virginia, USA - SEP 8, 2001
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Alright beer. Not the best, but far above the worst. Overall i enjoyed it and thats all that matters.
kmeves (1098) - Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 28, 2003
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This "draft beer" blows MGD away. It has some body to it. Still has that nasty Old Style aftertaste.
TheGuy (653) - Illinois, USA - FEB 23, 2008
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JUN 29, 2009 a little better than just plain old style but still just a crap american macro force feed how can i make money beer
pkbites (640) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - APR 10, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
This is the only ’genuine draft’ style beer that I actually find to be worth the hoopla. Real full body, and a nice, bitter after taste. It’s thick, not light and wimpy.
Hoss (607) - Florida, USA - NOV 18, 2001
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
A decent mainstream brew