crossovert (11105) - Illinois, USA - SEP 13, 2015
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
355ml bottle. Pale Gold pour, generic pale alger, but cheap around here, and a go to if in the situation.
drowland (7876) - Georgia, USA - AUG 1, 2009
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Had from a 12oz. can from a friend. I was curious to try this since theyíve went back to the older version. Honestly, itís not great, but itís not nearly as bad as Old Style was before they went back to this recipe.
TheAlum (6926) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - APR 18, 2010
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
A few cans killed on the balcony with friends. Been awhile since I did a "Slumming it" rating. 12 oz can pours a pale straw, transparent, bubbly bright white carbonation driven head that dies to a small ring, laces minimally. Aromas are cereal grains, corn, hulls, a bit watery and a touch dirty. Simple. Initial is similar, light bodied and a mix of watery grains, corn, cereal malts, and no real hop presence to be found. Goes down very easy, very forgetful, but it would be hard to find too many outward offensive flavors in this beer. A light lager that lacks character and gets a bit vegetal through the watery thin body.
FROTHINGSLOSH (6615) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 8, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Sampled from a 12 oz can this beer poured a medium yellow-gold with a medium sized soapy whit head that faded quickly. The aroma was sweet, tangy, corny and industrial. The flavor was dryish, tangy and had a touch of cardboard. The finish was short, tangy and vaguely bitter. Thin body. Not much to this one. Bland and inoffensive.
JPDIPSO (5569) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 30, 2009
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. Straw color and a nice tall off-white head. Decent steady flow of bubbles regenerate the head. Corn and grain aromas, no real change detected. Hints of pale malt in the front. Decent feel, not as spritzy as it looks. Some grains in the middle, but really quite thin flavor-wise. HInt os floral hops in the finish. Iíll say it does seem to be a bit smoother, but still quite lacking in flavor.
Skyview (5537) - Papoose Jct, Minnesota, USA - JAN 17, 2009
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Purchased from Cellars Wine & Spirits in Shorewood, MN and sampled from 12-oz can, pours a clear golden straw brew with a decent white head that slowly dissipates to a thin white ring and film top. A little more golden grain malt and citrus hop aroma than the previous version with a hint of corn. Taste is smoother and not as gritty as the previous version, light bodied, some carbonation with a nice balanced flavors of golden grain malt, corn, citrus hops and a hint of white bread dough. Finish is light, crisp and clean cut with very little aftertaste. Definitely a smoother and easy drinking light beer compared to the previous version but not as semi-sweet as the historical Heileman product of the 1970s and 1980s. A decent session beer for hot summers and mass market light beer drinkers but not a beer geek caliper beer. Along with the recent Schlitz 1960s formula revival I am happy to see another historical brand returned with a decent light beer formula.
badgerben (4849) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - APR 26, 2009
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Thanks to Skyview for sharing! Yellow color with a medium head. Light grain and corn aroma. Pretty much the same flavor. Cleanly fermented, nothing offensive at all. Certainly drinkable.
luttonm (4519) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 30, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
22oz can. Glad to try a local standout. At least the ads were on every bar in town. Typical lager, but a bit more flavor than Iíd expect at the expense of carbonation and crispness. wattery, metallic. not the worst thing out there.
Nuffield (4049) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Side by side with the "regular" Old Style. This retains evidence of head much longer, though the color is basically the same. I would agree that there is a slightly smoother texture to this--less carbonation on the finish and a sensibility that it is like a hand-pull vs. a pressurized tap. But the flavor is also less distinctive--more watery, less grain. Probably a notch better than the regular, but tough to say when youíre making judgments in this league of beers. Can.
Frank (3971) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUN 27, 2010
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
So Old Style changed its recipe to an old one and RateBeer thinks itís a different beer. Having drank plenty of both versions I can tell you that itís not much different and I have no idea why as of June of 2010 itís listed as a separate beer. That being said, I love my ticks so here goes... This is as classic an example you can get of an American lager brewed w/ corn. From itís yellow golden color to its crisp, light flavor it is pretty much exactly what you expect from this style. The possible exception to this is I find it has somewhat less carbonation than many of its cousins which makes it a bit more drinkable but a bit less crisp. There are examples of American lagers I like better but that is mostly personal preference. This is about as good as it gets for the style and was before they changed to the old recipe too.