 graham515 (420), Houston, Texas, USA
Jul 18, 2007 A pretty mediocre beer. I only enjoyed this one as much as i did because it was consumed at wrigley field. I really loved how everyone drank this instead of bud.
troyc (1173), Lubbock, Texas, USA
Jul 16, 2007 (Bottle) Pours a yellow color with small white head. Pretty average tasting pale lager. It does have a little bit more body than the average beer of the style. Having said that, it is still rather bland... but tastes great at a Cubs game.
Moprmn (14), Williamsville, Illinois, USA
Jul 12, 2007 I guess my tastes are different than most. I kinda liked this beer. It had more taste and aroma than a lot of cheap beers out there (and some "Good Beers" too). Though it wasn’t the best it didn’t seen to be as watered down as most old beers with the "same recipe". And at 10.99 a 30 pack ohhhhhh you betcha I’d buy some more!
bager (2121), Copenhagen N, Denmark
Jul 12, 2007 On tap in a shady dive in Chicago. I dont know if it was the atmos - but - I was not impressed :-)
Thin, weak and boring with notes of butter, metal and grass.
pojo41 (315), Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
Jul 3, 2007 Even as a teenager I knew this stuff was bad. However, it may have slightly more taste than some of it’s competitors "premium" beers.
JLAudio (282), Crestwood, Illinois, USA
Jun 20, 2007 Bad beer...cheap bad beer. Too bad its the official Cubs beer (besides Budweiser). Only a Wrigley Field Drink! Go Cubs!
charltonworker (5), USA
does not count  Jun 11, 2007 I guess the taste is what is to be expected for a beer that is associated with Cubs baseball... bad and flat. It is best used to grill brats with. It does get extra points for it’s cheapness.
mhollender22 (9), USA
does not count Jun 11, 2007 As was said, a nice summertime beer. Also nice at a club, when everything else is price gouged to oblivion. Smooth, and, creamy.
|
View Statistics
