 phaleslu (467), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 13, 2009 16 oz. draft at Wrigley Field, not my choice. Vile. Unlike other cheap pale lagers, this one is offensive in addition to offering few positives. If this didn’t have positive associations of the Cubs, Wrigley, and baseball for so many people, I wouldn’t understand its existence.
Cavie (1369), Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 21, 2009 Little smell but has an adjunct aroma. Light flavor, that is more or less smooth. But not much flavor though.
kimcgolf (828), Dacula, Georgia, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Jun 13, 2009 Hadn’t drank one of these for 25 years. Taste is much more subdued than it once was, but still grainy. Nose was muted, but still grainy. The appearance remained light golden yellow with small white head and little to no lacing. Actually not much skunk in the finish, just not much esle either. Can’t say this was a bad beer, just not much good about it either.
Nice 2009 commemorative Cubs bottle though.
jimmack34 (566), Lancaster, Ohio, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Jun 6, 2009 It’spretty funny that the first thing i thought without ever drinking this beer and never reading a review, is that this is a good ballpark beer. Then i see the reviews and alot of people refrence this to baseball. Just a typical pale lager with some graininess, slight corn, and some dry hops. Just a lil better than PBR, but not much.
snakeoilpete (324), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Jun 2, 2009 Updated: Jun 4, 2009Appropriately on tap at a Cubs game. Pours bubbly golden with a large foamy white head that lasts til the end. The smells and tastes are sweet, slightly fruity malt. Not as watery as I might have expected.
glkaiser (1164), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
May 31, 2009 It’s Old Style. We used to call it Dog Style. Good to drink while watching a Cubs game, and that’s about it. Tastes better warm than most crappy beers. Booya. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs. Go Cubs.
brew4fun (168), West Virginia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
May 31, 2009 Nothing objectionable, but nothing to rave about either. Average pale lager, draft at Wrigley Field. Pale gold with short-lived white head. Light grainy flavor with some corn.
Jayson2425 (167), Box Elder, South Dakota, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
May 24, 2009 Good beer to have with some old timers in a dump bar. They will buy rounds and rounds of this stuff like no other.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)