heemer77 (5108) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - OCT 24, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2006 Light yellow body with a thick head. The aroma is meaty with some light pork and corn. There are also raw soybeans and a hint of carrots. The taste is raw corn and some light dirt. There is a finish of old bubblegum. Not too bad for a non alcoholic.
imdownthepub (10650) - Banbury, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND - SEP 24, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottled. Pale yellow, heavily carbonated. Does what it says I suppose, low alcohol, thin low impact. Barley malt note, if you have to drive then its better than losing your license.
KnutAlbert (6267) - Oslo, NORWAY - SEP 17, 2005
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
An OK midday refreshment, which has a proper beer taste. I have had lagers with less taste than this – a certain king of beers springs to mind. Rather malty, as these brews tend to be, but it has hops, too.
Cornfield (5552) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - AUG 29, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Drinkable - a watery gold substance with a initially fluffy head, then film. The aroma is thankfully faint and the taste is of light sweet malt with some dirty floral hopping. Bitter tiny finish. Yum!
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL<font size=-1>
SDalkoholic (2179) - Linda Vista, California, USA - JUL 28, 2005
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12 oz bottle: Rather weak and boring aroma with not much signs of ingredients. Flavor is the typical non alcoholic sweet malt and is similar to a cereal and wet cardboard.
bu11zeye (11971) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(Bottle) Pours a pale yellow with a small white head. Aroma of mild maltiness and grassy hops. Watery texture. Flavor of malt and barley with a hint of sweetness.
Precept53 (147) - West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA - MAY 29, 2005
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JAN 24, 2006 Bottle.... exceptionally smooth, crisp taste(for a NA) medium malt taste that is not overpowering. There are better NAs out there such as Gerstel or Claushauler. The good thing about this beer is that is lacks the "skunk" found in many NA’s
larsniclas (5740) - Billdal, SWEDEN - MAY 28, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Golden, white firm head.
Cereal and corn-aroma with some hops.
Thin and loads of carbonation.
Dry and papery with some hoppy notes.
beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - MAY 19, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Okay, right. So I did not know this was a NA beer when I bought it, so that explains a lot of why it tasted weird. Bought this off a little street shop near Montmartre, Paris. The guy had to wipe the can from dirt and stuff to make it look presentable. Yummy. I dont know why exactly I still drank from it, but I guess you have different standards on the road. Oh right, and I still thought it had alcohol in it. Fair, but it is an NA. Amazing how many bieres in France market themselves as blondes, so hoity-toity.
georgekillian (344) - Alabama, USA - MAY 4, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
i can’t believe this crap even exists, i admit i love trying NA beers just to trash them, but this beer is def one of the worse. i am ashamed for heineken to even come out with this crap