SDalkoholic (2146) - Linda Vista, California, USA - JUL 28, 2005
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12 oz bottle: Rather weak and boring aroma with not much signs of ingredients. Flavor is the typical non alcoholic sweet malt and is similar to a cereal and wet cardboard.
bu11zeye (11955) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(Bottle) Pours a pale yellow with a small white head. Aroma of mild maltiness and grassy hops. Watery texture. Flavor of malt and barley with a hint of sweetness.
Precept53 (147) - West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA - MAY 29, 2005
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JAN 24, 2006 Bottle.... exceptionally smooth, crisp taste(for a NA) medium malt taste that is not overpowering. There are better NAs out there such as Gerstel or Claushauler. The good thing about this beer is that is lacks the "skunk" found in many NA’s
larsniclas (5621) - Billdal, SWEDEN - MAY 28, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Golden, white firm head.
Cereal and corn-aroma with some hops.
Thin and loads of carbonation.
Dry and papery with some hoppy notes.
beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - MAY 19, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Okay, right. So I did not know this was a NA beer when I bought it, so that explains a lot of why it tasted weird. Bought this off a little street shop near Montmartre, Paris. The guy had to wipe the can from dirt and stuff to make it look presentable. Yummy. I dont know why exactly I still drank from it, but I guess you have different standards on the road. Oh right, and I still thought it had alcohol in it. Fair, but it is an NA. Amazing how many bieres in France market themselves as blondes, so hoity-toity.
georgekillian (344) - Alabama, USA - MAY 4, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
i can’t believe this crap even exists, i admit i love trying NA beers just to trash them, but this beer is def one of the worse. i am ashamed for heineken to even come out with this crap
oh6gdx (20395) - Vasa, FINLAND - APR 27, 2005
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Canned. Clear pale yellow colour, huge bubbly white hed. Aroma is metallic and malty and very unpleasant. Sweet malty flavour with metallic hints and a small hoppy rise in the finish.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - APR 17, 2005
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clear yellow in color, thin white head; yeasty, malty aroma, slightly sour. Flavor is sweet malt, slightly metallic. I suppose it’s not so bad for a NA brew, but it’s still not very good at all.
JPDIPSO (4956) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - APR 13, 2005
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Yellow straw color with a taller white head. Aromas of white bread, light flowers and damp grain. Light wort flavors dominate. Touch of herbal and floral hops kick in to help ebb the sweetness. Some decent barley flavors, just Too worty.
DocLock (7876) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 23, 2005
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another low alcohol piss-water concoction. I see that turbo has rated this just prior to me, so he’ll enjoy that my overall impression is the same overall impression i got when Greg "Lubed Anus" bled AIDS all over the Olympic pool. Thank God for chlorine!