hopdog (8773) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 30, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
The only reason I tried this beer is because my brother is big on NA beers (I have to work on that). Poured a light, clear yellow with a small white head. Smells like ass (quite funky). Lightly sweet. Thin and watery body.
DerBiermeister (586) - Birmingham, Alabama, USA - NOV 15, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
All Heineken beers are not THAT good. This is a Heineken beer. It is not THAT good. It is, however, an above average Non-Alcoholic brew (if you’re into that sort of kinko thing). Personally I think that besides not having much alcohol in it, this, taste-wise is on the same quality level as Heineken if not better, but then...who cares?
PhillyBeer2112 (2515) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - OCT 11, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Very very bland, I had almost expected to get a better than average NA here, but nope.
YogiBeera (2435) - Hamburg, GERMANY - OCT 2, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden, spare head, soft carbonation, sulphur and cabbage nose. Sweet thin sugar taste.
pivo (2542) - GERMANY - SEP 26, 2004
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Nose doesn’t give away that this is an NA. Pale yellow color and big foamy head. So thin and quick there is really nothing to rate or taste in detail. Watery, of course. Have had worse NAs though...
Crash (531) - Macomb, Illinois, USA - SEP 20, 2004
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
I was tricked into drinking this; before I knew what it was the guy was pouring it into my glass. He said it was the best non alcohol beer on the market. The fact that he was telling me that was a bit wrong but, I disagree with him. I’ve tried several other non alcoholic beers and this one was the worst.
Marko (3878) - Split / Zagreb, CROATIA - SEP 17, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This was simply bad, I expected it to be at least drinkable, coming from Heineken, but it certainly wasn’t. Watery, with a sort of odd, possibly fake malty sweetness, looked fine, but the taste was almost unbearable.
TBone (12333) - Pori, FINLAND - AUG 15, 2004
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottled (BB 11/2004)
Lager color with small white head. Grassy nose, slightly rubbery and skunked. This NA beer actually tastes a kind of pilsener, unfortunately grassy hops are quite weak and there is some sweet artifical malt aroma.
Nate (3636) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 16, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Skunky, cheesy aroma, off-kilter hops, and no malt. Mostly weak sweet corny, bready smell. Medium gold clear with thin white lacing head. Light watery body with medium-heavy carbonation. Horrible taste. Grainy, fake sweetness, with little hops, and a nasty bitterness. Corny, bready finish and bitter after - like aspirin bitter.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JUL 9, 2004
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I am amzed that heineken broke presidence and put this in a brown bottle. This is just one of those drank out of sheer boredom for the rating, as it was sitting there and I figured why not. This is not terrible among this type of beers. Golden fizzy and watery, the aroma has a bit of a burnt rubber smell. What can I say overall this tastes like shit.