ogivlado (5294) - Zagreb, CROATIA - JUN 10, 2003
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottled(500ml). -light malty aroma, small white head, bitter finish, not bad for non alcoholic beer
Mads Langtved (2245) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - MAY 16, 2003
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Considering the low alc content this "beer" is not as bad as most light beers. However, it is still not good.
Dogbrick (6826) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - MAY 5, 2003
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Sampled a friend's at Thirsty Dog. About what you would expect of a NA produced by Heineken I suppose. Light gold color with a thin white head. Little lacing. Aroma is faint hops with a skunky aspect as well. Thin and watery and fizzy, with very mild hops and a somewhat filmy finish. I'd choose Warsteiner's NA over this any day.
Norton (327) - Southside, Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAY 2, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Let's see.... it smells like a sweaty baboon's ass crack; is an N.A. brew, and is oddly priced-up. At least it looks vaguely interesting in a glass - like a hefeweizen's red-headed stepchild. Slightly cloudy; actual limited head. Tasteless, except for skunkiness. Ugh, the things you do (and drink) to try and win a t-shirt. Should be renamed Barfler.
jbrus (4993) - Delft, NETHERLANDS - APR 9, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Mine was brewed in Spain (Aguila?). Very light horseblanket aroma. Pale golden color, white head that diminishes fast leaving no lace. Grainy, chemical, little bitterness. Little herbal in the finish.
WISEGUY572 (1372) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 26, 2003
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Hey, this is worse than Coors N.A. Almost no aroma. Appearance is initially quite good ... clear golden amber with big white head but the head vanishes before you even sip the beer. Flavor, like aroma, is best described as missing. A little malt, a little floral hoppiness, a little bitterness, but mostly bitter metalic aftertaste on a mouth of water. The warmer the beer gets the more unpleasant it gets. This is probably best drunk as nearly frozen slurry.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - DEC 13, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not bad would rather have the alcohol in it but for an NA it gets you there when your in a bind
austinpowers (2827) - New York, New York, USA - OCT 22, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: APR 30, 2004 Nothing to really complain about here. This brew's par for the course when it comes to European NA beers. A decent, crisp and slightly watery taste.
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - AUG 31, 2002
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Fruity malt and light herb aroma, pretty insignificant dryness on the palate.A little herb and spice with a slightly soapy finish.
SmellGood (339) - Memphis, Tennessee, USA - AUG 19, 2002
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Seems to me when your Dr. puts you on the wagon, this is where you turn. OK for a non-beer.